Top 10 lightweights: All time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JAB5239, Jun 10, 2011.


  1. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,931
    82
    Oct 1, 2006
    Duran
    Williams
    Leonard
    Ross
    Gans
    Armstrong
    Arguello
    Ortiz
    Canzoneri
    Whitaker
     
  2. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,615
    317
    Feb 23, 2008
    AHHHH, you guys are driving me nuts!!! How do Ross and Williams rank above Gans all time?
     
  3. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    Never trust a man ranking Pea as the 10th greatest lightweight.
     
  4. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    Why so many have Ambers outside their Top10 is beyond me. Please look a bit closer into that man. Amazing carrer and a great resume at 135. Better than for example Chavez who many have in there.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well said.
    Lou Ambers was superb lightweight, almost certainly among the top 10.

    I tend to believe the 1930s produced the greatest lightweight era.
     
  6. Armstrong!

    Armstrong! Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    3
    Jun 10, 2011
    Come on, Armstrong's got to be in everybody's top 5.

    For me, Gans is the GOAT at lightweight. He had it all and a resume as deep as the Grand Canyon.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,813
    51,868
    Mar 21, 2007
    01 - Benny Leonard
    02 - Joe Gans
    03 - Roberto Duran
    04 - Henry Armstrong
    05 - Jack McAullife
    06 - Carlos Ortiz
    07 - Pernell Whitaker
    08 - Packy McFarland
    09 - Tony Canzoneri
    10 - Ike Williams
     
  8. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    Duran should be the consensus #1.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,813
    51,868
    Mar 21, 2007
    Maybe - he's not though.
     
  10. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    :nono
     
  11. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010
    Duran couldn't handle movers.
     
  12. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    Yes, everyone has there own criteria for p4p lists like these but I will always believe that Duran had the most dominant reign at 135 and presents the most difficult h2h matchup for any other LW champion in history. He was an attack dog with gloves on.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,813
    51,868
    Mar 21, 2007
    I don't regard him as a class above men like Whitaker head to head.

    I think it's easy to make cases for other guys to rank above Duran - namely they beat better men.
     
  14. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    I agree that SRL gave him fits(@WW) in the rematch but what "movers" do you speak of @135?
     
  15. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    true. his lightweight resume is filled with a lot of goods/very goods (dejesus) but only one possible great in buchanan. the argument for duran is longetivity, consistency, dominance in wins and h2h (which many people don't count)

    as a sidenote it's interesting to see the variety of placements for a guy like ike williams that i once thought as a top 5 lock but certainly doesn't appear to be so once you consider that leonard, gans, duran and armstrong are pretty much guaranteed spots up there