Top 10 Lightweights of All Time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Dec 4, 2008.


  1. Sonny Carson

    Sonny Carson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,995
    5
    Jan 7, 2007
    1 - Roberto Duran
    2 - Pernell Whitaker
    3 - Benny Leonard
    4 - Ike Williams
    5 - Joe Gans
    6 - Henry Armstrong
    7 - Tony Canzoneri
    8 - Alexis Arguello
    9 - Shane Mosley
    10-Carlos Ortiz
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    261
    Jul 22, 2004
    I forgot Napoles, might have been near his best weight, drop him in from 3-5
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,427
    26,903
    Feb 15, 2006
    What has that got to do with anything?

    Based on acomplishments it would be hard to put Joe Gans outside the top 3.
     
  4. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    Wrong. Yes, only body sparring. Not full contact sparring.
     
  5. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    711
    May 22, 2007
    You said Floyd could stop him late and score a knockdown or two, which is why I brought up the fact Basilio stood up to Robinsons power and you talked about how Ray was past his best. I'm not putting words in your mouth you claimed Floyd could knockdown Basilio.
     
  6. Sonny Carson

    Sonny Carson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,995
    5
    Jan 7, 2007
    He's there because he's a head to head monster against most of the top lightweights except for Duran and Whitaker. It' not his fought the fight against Stevie Johnson didn't get done.
     
  7. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,146
    Oct 22, 2006

    Duran would not fight at 135 again post 1980, indeed he never fought at 135 post 78, so what has a fight at 147, in 1980 got to do with Duran at 135 pre 79?
     
  8. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    He was at his best during his early welterweight reign, until he ran into Forrest. His skills peaked during that time as did his speed.
     
  9. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    He was better during these fights; Wise, Rivera, De La Hoya I, Diaz, Taylor, Stone.
     
  10. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    As I already said, because it makes him a fighter that is willing to disgracefully and inexcusably quit. He's that fighter whether we talk about him at lightweight, welterweight, or any other weight.
     
  11. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,146
    Oct 22, 2006
    The fighter who lost to Leonard in 1980 was not the fighter who destroyed Lampkin, that was Duran at his best at 135.

    You would not hold Arguello up for coming back perhaps 20 years and 15lbs past his best to lose to one Scott Walker, would you?
     
  12. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    What's disgraceful or inexcusable about losing a decision?

    Besides, I don't have Arguello rated as #1 either, so what's the difference?
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    261
    Jul 22, 2004
    Herol Graham and Chris Eubank sparred all out at Wincobank
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    261
    Jul 22, 2004
    I think he was every bit as good at LW if not better, he looked much more fluid back then. Plus he had that massive size advantage at LW
     
  15. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,146
    Oct 22, 2006

    Nothing; same as losing to one of the three best Welters of all-time as well as a top 20 all-time fighter, having his premier performance against you, despite you being 12lbs over your best fighting weight.

    It also has nothing to do with your career at a different weight.