Top 10 P4P at the end of 2007???? What's yours???

I always admit I am wrong if there is proof PacD. Can you say ther same? (I know you can't my friend, as you have often simply changed the subject)

 

Perhaps they did....but his subsequent fights proved it was not. Losing to Pacquiao sure, ok. David Diaz is an average fighter who only has a belt because it was stripped from someone else.

 

Im still waiting for PacD or chert to explain how the Raheem fight was a fluke. I wont hold my breath though.

 

And at 154-160...Wright was still a great fighter. He is nothing of the sort at LHW. He is too small and it showed in his conditioning. Wright is no longer that fighter though. You don't seem to think much of weight classes. It's the same reason why I give Hopkins very little credit for stopping DLH at MW. Those classes are there for a reason. Anyone who saw Wright at 170 knows he was not the same guy who fought Trinidad and Mosley. And for your information, I dropped Wright before he lost to Hopkins.

 

well, it seems that the Ring and their ratings panel composed of many different boxing journalists treated that fight as a fluke too as evidence by their top 10 p4p rankings during that time.

 

Hatton had fought and won a very close fight with a WW. He is not a true WW. Neither is PBF.

Wright is a small MW. Hopkins was always a huge MW who fought his first fight at LHW and always said he could easily make that weight. Hopkins is bigger than Jones who was a small LHW.

So to review, Wright is small MW fighting a LHW, that's 2 weight classes. PBF is not a true WW (he is outweighed by WW on fight night by a signifigant amount) and neither is Hatton.

 

Spread whatever you wish, just stop insulting others legacy to do it.

And you didn't admit you were wrong with Guzman until pressed. You just insulted him (like just now) and said there were some miscalculations. After I called you on it, you admitted you were wrong.

 

hey, always remember: PINOY STANDS FOR GAYBOY!!!!:yep

 

Props with caveats. Sounds like a backhanded compliment.

 

Different scenario. And I gave Pacquiao plenty of props for being a 112 champ at his age. I give him NO props for moving up in weight. He didn't move to 122 cuz he wanted a bigger challenge. He did so because he was a growing teen. His true weight as an adult is 122. I gave him props for beating MAB at 126 because he was moving up then for bigger challenges. He could have been at 122 for a couple of years.