Top 10 P4P at the end of 2007???? What's yours???

I think its very ballsy of Dawson to face Mendoza. The others are in hiding of this great fighter(Dawson).

 

Really? Cuz Cotto hasn't beaten a single P4P guy or even a fighter with a belt. He has not been the man in any division. Yet he is rated.

There are no criteria for being P4P. It depends on the fighter and what he has shown. Dawson is certainly considred, and while Adamek wasn't P4P (I had him at #10 when Dawson beat him) on many lists, he was certainly highly regarded.

The names you named off....only ONE of them is even close to viable. Hopkins. And he is nearly 43. How can you say "He needs to fight p4p guys" then name off Tarver, Jones, and Wright at LHW?

 

I like this list,it will be hard to argue with the top 5 if your predictions are correct.
I'd put Wlad at #10

 

Kinda like you and your "vision" for Pacman and where he places on what he COULD do?

Do you dispute that Cotto hasn't beaten a P4P fighter or a champion with a belt?

Do you dispute that Jones isn't old, that Tarver isn't old, and that Wright isn't a LHW?

 

You want to rate fighters on excitement, what they could do instead of what's done, and nationality, go right on ahead. Stop getting upset when others don't.

 

You don't have to fight fighters who are old to prove a point. You fight GOOD fighters, not name fighters.

You never said defend a title. You said:

Dominating a weight class means cleaning out the contenders, fighting other champions. He didn't. That word can't just mean anything you like.

As for your KO's mean more than UD and SD? SD's yes....UD's, nope.

If this is your position, you position all great KO fighters over Boxers who have little power, but win all the time. That's fine for you. Luckily, while KO's make you more exciting most of the time, they don't make you the better fighter, and most of the boxing world gets that.

 

PacDBest you are digging a hole for yourself that keeps getting deeper and deeper. Take a paus from the keyboard and come back tomorrow. I am sure you will then see that KG writes the truth in this matter.

 

You have never cornered me PacD. What you call cornering is you arguing points (like now) that have nothing to do with what you originally said.

You think because I can't prove Pacman CAN'T do something, it means he can. You never actually prove he CAN yourself. You're like someone who believes in a religion. You don't care about proof, just faith, and since no one can prove it won't work, you think you've won.

If you have proven me wrong so often, how come no one else (besides your buddies who back anything you say) can see it?

Name one PacD. That open debate is still on the table BTW.

 

Margarito vs Williams.

What does that have to do with anything?

 

Why not predict the top p4p at the end of 2013?

There are important contests yet to be decided. :nono