Nice find! That dino cretin posts so much rubbish it is hard to keep up with. He also claims to have better technique on the speed and heavy bags than Wlad.
lebedev is 37 years old and looked extremely past his prime in his latest fight (which i'm sure you didn't see), and huck was outboxing glowacki before the KO - it was obvious i wasn't referring to the briedis fight if you actually read my post. i've been high on gassiev for a long time, but i felt he showed his limitations in the lebedev fight - he's far from the finished article right now. still a high potential guy given his age though.
In Lebedev's last fight he cruised to a decision in fight you could tell he didn't give a crap about. Not sure how it's even possible to look past your prime in that kind of fight when he clearly wasn't taking the fight seriously. And nothing in your post talked specifically about Huck vs Glowaki. You said he was super competitive with top 4 fighters in the division. Bredis is most recent and closer to being a top 4 than Glowacki is right now
you're right. i posted somewhere else about the briedis fight not long before and thought it was part of that post. apologies, my bad. as for lebedev, i think 37 is past prime for just about anybody, and the guy's been through some major wars. i'll grant you it's hard to know for sure based on one semi-meaningless fight though. anyways, my point is, i look at e.g. the TRBB cruiserweight rankings and i see a 37 year old at 3, a fairly crude guy who was outboxed by huck before his late KO at 4, tony friggin' bellew at 5, an aging wlod at 7 and an aging huck at 10. boxrec's top 10 still contains steve cunningham, has bellew at 3, bellew's victim makabu at 9, kudrya at 10 who already lost a fight he was expected to cruise through due to his serious limitations as a boxer. the ring has bellew at 3 and 90 year old firat arslan at 8. usyk is very good bordering on p4p list contention, briedis is strong and gassiev could grow into a very good fighter with some refining, but overall it's not exactly murderers row.
37 isn't really past your prime when you consider he really started his career at 29. You're shytting on Bellew for some reason but he hasn't fought any of the top contenders at CW. His ranking is based on hype from beating Haye at HW so it's really not relevant when talking about the tournament Lebedev isn't in the tournament either. The beauty of the tournament is assuming no injuries it will produce contenders.
He is a good fighter and his hype as the Thurmanator has somehow carried on even when he hasn't stopped any of his last few opponents. I think he's a solid welterweight but don't understand how people include him in their top 10 lists. The body shot from Collazo and the backing away in the DG will be his downfall soon. He should just fight Porter again.
Ridiculous to predict in something as unpredictable as boxing, especially three years down the line but I'll play. Pretty decent list but Crawford without good competition doesn't make him p4p definitely not that high. Spence whether he beats Thurman or not will still make p4p. Ward will be retired by then so its understandable you left him out. But p4p in three years in current form is Loma or AJ after beating VK,DW and TF if he returns.
Good list until you got to 8. Can't make sense of Parker being in a top 10 p4p list, it will never ever happen. Btw, why do you never sign in to Zodiac anymore?