Top 100 Premier Boxing Organisation March Ratings

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FrancescoD, Feb 28, 2016.


Page 1 of 2
  1. FrancescoD

    FrancescoD Active Member Full Member

    711
    53
    Mar 24, 2014
    FrancescoD, Feb 28, 2016
    FrancescoD, Feb 28, 2016
    #1
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,531
    83,347
    Nov 30, 2006
    What is Premier Boxing Organization?
     
    IntentionalButt, Feb 28, 2016
    IntentionalButt, Feb 28, 2016
    #2
  3. larsker

    larsker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,342
    79
    Jun 5, 2010
    They used to be known as the IBWR. Independent Boxing Writers Ratings
     
    larsker, Feb 28, 2016
    larsker, Feb 28, 2016
    #3
  4. Mexi-Box

    Mexi-Box Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,809
    8
    Apr 19, 2013
    Already, I can see it's a pretty bad list. Stiverne too high and Pulev too low.

    Parker and Glazkov laughably high. Chagaev is too low. When was the last update, and also, are they using a weird ranking system where they combine all the belt rankings together or something?

    That list is pretty bad.
     
    Mexi-Box, Feb 28, 2016
    Mexi-Box, Feb 28, 2016
    #4
  5. FrancescoD

    FrancescoD Active Member Full Member

    711
    53
    Mar 24, 2014
    Used to be IWBR. Independent World Boxing Rankings.

    The ratings are calculated by the man that beat the man. Chagaev has not beaten a good fighter for nearly 10 years. Pulev has not beaten even an average fighter for 30 months. Stiverne has, and his only loss was on points to Wilder. With the guidance of the Association of boxing commissions and the US government we forged the system that fighters lost points/ranking for not facing a ranked fighter in a time sequence (18 months). This was stop fighters that just sit on a rating.
    Parker and Glazkov have fought reasonable fighters hence their position.
    We can over-ride bad calls hence Glazkov and Martin was treated as a NC for the purpose of rating as it was on an injury not caused by the fight. Chudinov remains above Sturm. The fight was scored as if Chudinov won for the purpose of ranking.
    Fighters might get one or two places out but it reflects achievement in the ring favoured to recent but not entirely disregarding yesteryears.
     
    FrancescoD, Feb 28, 2016
    FrancescoD, Feb 28, 2016
    #5
  6. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,159
    27,883
    Jan 18, 2010
    I love the thing where they show the ranking of the opponents they beat,which kinda "exposes" a couple of pretenders, and shows that some "bums" actually have very decent resumes.

    Although I rate him, it also shows that a guy like Joshua is ranked pretty high in these rankings while only 3 of his opponents were borderline top50, and one at #36. And Wlad's resume miles above everyone at the weight (obviously) followed at a big distance by Povetkin after who there's another big gap.
     
    Robney, Feb 29, 2016
    Robney, Feb 29, 2016
    #6
  7. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,364
    240,884
    Nov 23, 2013
    God I hope this doesn't lead to another belt.:hang
     
    CST80, Feb 29, 2016
    CST80, Feb 29, 2016
    #7
  8. Mexi-Box

    Mexi-Box Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,809
    8
    Apr 19, 2013
    You guys don't even seem to follow your own rules. How is Dominick Wade above Sam Soliman when 99% know that Wade robbed him?

    Daniel Geale at #3 at MW? :verysad

    Terrible list, man.
     
    Mexi-Box, Feb 29, 2016
    Mexi-Box, Feb 29, 2016
    #8
  9. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,159
    27,883
    Jan 18, 2010
    Yes, the name change really points to that... There are too many belts as it is, shattering the talent to not fight eachother.
     
    Robney, Feb 29, 2016
    Robney, Feb 29, 2016
    #9
  10. FrancescoD

    FrancescoD Active Member Full Member

    711
    53
    Mar 24, 2014
    You obviously don't understand much. No list is going to agree with everyone.
    Geale lost to Cotto and Golovkin, he is moving down now due to non-compliance and will be #5 next month. You need to make the case why someone else should be higher. The rankings are based on who beat who, not on what you think. If you can pick 50 flaws that dont concurr with a genuine consensus then fair enough, but citing Chagaev because he was a good fighter in 2007 won't cut it.
    Wade-Soliman was much closer than the Sturm-Chudinov robbery. What we don't do is break rules.
     
    FrancescoD, Mar 1, 2016
    FrancescoD, Mar 1, 2016
    #10
  11. Mexi-Box

    Mexi-Box Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,809
    8
    Apr 19, 2013
    Wade-Soliman was a clear robbery. You just broke your own damn rules. Terrible, terrible list.
     
    Mexi-Box, Mar 3, 2016
    Mexi-Box, Mar 3, 2016
    #11
  12. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,159
    27,883
    Jan 18, 2010
    :good
     
    Robney, Mar 3, 2016
    Robney, Mar 3, 2016
    #12
  13. EnzoRD

    EnzoRD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,697
    172
    Apr 21, 2008
    Why is Anthony Joshua ranked higher than Charles Martin?
     
    EnzoRD, Mar 3, 2016
    EnzoRD, Mar 3, 2016
    #13
  14. Mexi-Box

    Mexi-Box Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,809
    8
    Apr 19, 2013
    Oh, it wasn't as bad as Sturm/Chudinov so we can still rank Wade higher than Soliman. :rofl

    Dude is a fraud and his list sucks.
     
    Mexi-Box, Mar 3, 2016
    Mexi-Box, Mar 3, 2016
    #14
  15. Mexi-Box

    Mexi-Box Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,809
    8
    Apr 19, 2013
    Because the list makers break their own rules and suck at ranking fighters.
     
    Mexi-Box, Mar 3, 2016
    Mexi-Box, Mar 3, 2016
    #15
Page 1 of 2