no particular order pavlik,hamed,lacy,a.harrison,khan,s.robinson,big mac,ali,klichco,and hopkins off the top of my head.
Oki doki. :good I was gonna say because your English is better than mine lol, at first I thought you had just moved to Iceland.
Here's some: 1.Floyd Mayweather Jnr (never fought a live great in his career) 2.Felix Trinidad (when he didn't have his power at middle he has shown up as a poor boxer) 3.Julio Cesar Chavez (great fighter but would always be beaten by a certain style) 4.Riddick Bowe (shite- should have lost to Golota twice) 5.Wladimir Klitschko (a pale imitation of his brother) 6.George Foreman (another who relied too much on power alone. Good but not the great he was made out to be) 7.Joe Calzaghe (good, not great. Could prove greatness by fighting Pavlik, has only 3 really good wins in long career)
A little more specific please:rofl This BS blanket statement can be used against any fighter not named Marciano, Ricardo Lopez and PBF!atsch
I'm gonna take a stab at it for him bro... [This is usualy the argument with Chavez] and guess he means defensive, Counter puncher's... :smoke Am I Hot Am I Warm. To be fair tho... I honestly thought That Buddy McGirt would have been Randall before what Randall was to Chavez had they met at Welterweight during Buddy's run.
Most fighters have stylistic nightmares though, I mean look at Muhammad Ali he would of struggled with good defensive fighters, like he did with Jimmy Young, mainly because he couldn't switch to the body.
I'm with you bro... But that's the argument & the -'s people use against Chavez in H2H. [They base pretty much everything on Taylor, Whitaker & Randall]