Why do I need to explain it? I enjoyed that post and good footage, but it's hardly a deal breaker of any sort? Here's what I wrote about Carter last time I got deep into the rankings: If you can track it down or are in possession of it, it is worth revisiting Pete Ehrmann's 2007 Ring Magazine article on Jimmy Carter, which is about as fine a summary of the difficulties in ranking him as you are ever likely to see. To say Carter was something of a controversial figure is to put it mildly. His 1952 loss to Lauro Salas was viewed as suspect, his 1955 loss to Bud Smith, more so. In the Smith rematch, bizarre judging saw the fight result changed three times. In perhaps the worst refereeing performance of the decade, Carter was allowed to splatter a featherweight named Tommy Collins for ten minutes scoring one knockdown a minute in a nationally televised championship fight which brought coast-to-coast condemnation from viewers and press alike. His career was an absurd mess – despite the fact that he was a three times champion of the whole world with some wonderful wins over top opposition under his belt. The best of these wins was in his first for the title. It's true that the all-time-great power-punching technician that was Ike Williams was struggling badly with the lightweight weight limit by 1951, but it is also true that no lightweight had beaten him in six years. Carter, “a relative unknown even in his own hometown” according to the Associate Press, decked Williams four times before the referee rescued him in the fourteenth round. This is a wonderful win. Carter has more than a few of them. He beat top contenders like Tommy Campbell and George Araujo and he beat champions Paddy DeMarco and Lauro Salas. The problem is that he beat Salas and DeMarco only after having dropped the title to them before scooping it back up in rematches. There were some bold souls who named the Mafia man Carter was supposed to be taking instructions from, one Frankie Carbo (he is worth a Google if you are not acquainted). It is a fact that Ike Williams claimed to have been offered a bribe to lose before matching Carter, a bribe he refused (to his regret, having been beaten). In the end though, Carter's wins, particularly the most impressive of them, stand under fewer clouds than those suspect losses. Carter, a three-time champion, is therefore impossible to ignore; but it's with more than a little trepidation that I ensconce him in the top thirty. A quick word about all those losses; the majority took place outside the weight range we are interested in and of those we are interested in, he suffered many of them as he wound down his career, broke and eventually forcibly retired by at least one boxing commission. I'm happy with that appraisal. Brown: Beat no fewer than three #1 contenders which is rare. 12-1 in legitimate lightweight title matches Champion in six calendar years These are astonishing qualities. He's also one of the few champions who can lay claim to having "cleaned out the division", or nobody can, one or the other.
I would say 1950 to 1952, but Layne didn't stop winning exactly after the Marciano fight. He was never as successful, but besides Charles, he did defeat the decent Willie Bean, and got a draw in Europe with Heinz Neuhaus. His fights with Baker were close enough to warrant the two being matched three times. Of course, this doesn't match up to what he had done earlier, but he still had his moments. Araujo? It appears he didn't do much after the Carter bout. As for Matthews, I hope to post on him on the 1946-1955 heavyweight thread. I don't think losing to him is inexcusable. James perhaps. But Henry lost to Frank Buford. Baker and Valdes lost to Bill Gilliam. And Valdes came close to losing in his hometown to Archie McBride. Layne isn't the only guy with bad performances. He just has the best good ones.
Nice write up I hate to keep harping on it...but How did he clean out the division if he got knocked out cold by arauju while in his own prime?...arauju was on an absolute tear...one of the greatest runs of the era at 135. Carter ended his run despite being a huge underdog ...Brown never avenged the loss.
And that still leaves earl walls, whom twice knocked out Layne out cold in dominating fashion while Layne was a major player in the division. He also flattened top 10 Tommy Harrison in 1 round. Walls did enough to earn a top 5 ranking by ring magazine in back to back years. When did brion ever earn a top 5 rating?
Boxrec says Araururuuruaj never made the lightweight limit after 1953. He retired in 1955 (did come back). Brown didn't even begin his unbeaten streak until 1955 and didn't come to the title until 1956. He just wasn't anything to do with Brown's divisional dominance. At all.
Great to see you in more often of late Suzie! Your top three I have wrestled with as to who gets which spot for years and wouldn't disagree with anyone's choices there. I like how you bucked the trend and put Pernell over Ike, something many oldtimers might get riled over (Burt often said Ike was the best lightweight he had ever seen). Carlos at number 7 seems a solid pick, I can't see him higher and its good seeing someone include Blackburn as high as you did also.
Brown was four years removed from winning the championship and carving out one of the best reigns in the division's history. He may have been at his physical peak and was a good fighter, but much like Moore, I don't think he was quite prime as a boxer at that point. By the time he was, Araujo had hit the wall following an unsuccessful crack at Carter and fallen quickly.
Brion's top was #6, mainly because Louis was still being rated although his career was over. But should guys who rated better than 5th, like Co-kell, then be on the list? "He also flattened top 10 Tommy Harrison in 1 round." Harrison had also earlier beaten Walls. (just an aside--Harrison was KO'd by Abel Fernandez, who later played Youngfellow-I think the name was-on The Untouchables TV show, one of my favorites) Walls also had really bad losses to such as Alf Gallagher and Edgardo Romero. Overall, he didn't have the career Layne had. I asked before. Who do I knock out for Walls? LaStarza?
My 50's Rings are in a filing cabinet in the spare room, covered with assorted junk,when I get a chance I'll try and dig the article out.
Suz, if it's any consolation, over the years I've always done top 10 or top 15 lists in my head, but I've always enjoyed doing contenders. Probably because they don't get the automatic notoriety of champs on lists which have been done to death, and the subject is somewhat fresher. Anyways, in a top 15 list of lightweight contenders I've always rated Georgie Araujo. I too felt he had such a smooth style. Really liked him.
1 Gans 2 Duran 3 B Leonard 4 Armstrong 5 Whitaker 6 Ortiz 7 I Williams 8 Canzoneri 9 Ross 10 Arguello 11 Chavez 12 Mayweather 13 Lavigne 14 McFarland 15 Welsh 16 Ambers 17 J Brown 18 De Jesus 19 Buchanan 20 Laguna
I've always felt Laguna was overated ,but Ken Buchanan recently did a "Best I Have Faced" in the Ring,he rates him very highly.Maybe I've been too harsh on him?