A top 200 is not impossible. Obviously it's going to be subjective to a large degree, but you can still have a reasonable one. There's quite a few unreasonable selections in this one though.
I would add to this: Holman Williams and Luis Manuel Rodriguez are unacceptably low. Almost 50 places behind Calzaghe?? Be serious.
Now now DINAMITA you know the 'classic' forum is no place for slagging off, that kind of thing only goes on in the general 'boxing forum' I compiled this list a while ago with the hope that the experts on this forum would tweak it/perform major surgery on it, so we would end up with a reasonable atg top 200, i would particularly welcome some of the more respected posters on here to come out with their own atg top 200 {lets face it i have done most of the ground work and regardless of how poor some people may think my list is if they produced their own list, i am sure as many as 150 boxers off my list would be on their list, it is a starting point at least} When i say respected posters i dont mean you DINAMITA, to coin a phrase used by yourself :- I CANT TAKE ANYONE SERIOUSLY THAT HAS: no George Dixon or James J Jeffries in their top 100. No only kidding DINAMITA you are welcome to creating an atg 200 as i am sure you would make a good one as you are learning and gaining knowledge all the time, you do make some good points about the list ? When you mentioned Donald Curry i thought i definately left him out in error as i remember him being regarded as one of the best p4p boxers in his day {he even beat Wales Colin Jones:crying} then i checked his record only to see he lost against Honeyghan {182 on list} Nunn {193} Norris{151} and McCallum {79} so perhaps he was 'hyped up' like Pavlik ? I will update/amend the list shortly :happy
Wow.... you have Chris John above Ottke..... Im joking mate..... good effort.... a top 10 is battle... let alone a top 200....
Wow, have to admit I just skimmed the 2nd hundred. You have to get Bill Joppy off this list if you want it taken seriously.
The impossible task is deciding whether to rank Corrie Sanders #1 or just All Time Greatest in Perpetuity.
1] Sugar Ray Robinson 2] Armstrong 3] Langford 4] Greb 5] Pep 6] Duran 7] Wilde 8] Fitzsimmons 9] Tunney 10] Jack Johnson 11] Charles 12] B.Leonard 13] R.Leonard 14] Louis 15] Ali 16] Gans 17] Jofre 18] Walker 19] Moore 20] Burley 21] Ketchel 22] Marciano 23] Saddler 24] B.Ross 25] Whitaker 26] Monzon 27] Salvador Sanchez 28] Roy Jones Jnr 29] Canzoneri 30] I.Williams 31] Jack Dempsey 32] Hagler 33] Babadoes Joe Walcott 34] Holmes 35] Dixon 36] Cesar Charvez 37] E.Griffith 38] Arguello 39] Holyfield 40] Kid Gavilan 41] Hearns 42] Napoles 43] M.Ortiz 44] L.Lewis 45] Mayweather Jnr 46] Calzaghe 47] Britton 48] Olivares 49] M.Spinks 50] Pacquiao 51] Hopkins 52] Wills 53] Harada 54] W.Gomez 55] foster 56] Villa 57] Loughran 58] R.Lopez 59] Attell 60] Al Brown 61] C.Ortiz 62] Dick Tiger 63] Conn 64] Perez 65] Canto 66] McGovern 67] Trinidad 68] Ted Kid Lewis 69] Kid Chocolate 70] Joe Brown 71] Tiger Flower 72] Cerdan 73] Jeffries 74] Pryer 75] Basilio 76] Dundee 77] McLarnin 78] T.Ryan 79] McCallum 80] Montgomery 81] Beau Jack 82] Freddie Welsh 83] W.Benitez 84] De La Hoya 85] Barrera 86] Gibbons 87] Kilbane 88] Blackburn 89] Ambers 90] Tyson 91] H.Williams 92] Liston 93] Herman 94] Philly Jack O'Brien 95] LM Rodriquez 96] Cervantes 97] Zarate 98] Driscoll 99] Toney 100]Galaxy 101]Hatton 102]Tszyu 103]Rosenbloom 104]Zale 105]Vicente Salvador 106]LaBarba 107]Kid Williams 108]Genero 109]Nonpareil Jack Dempsey 110]Battling Nelson 111]B.Lynch 112]La Motta 113]Foreman 114]Frazier 115]Wolgast 116]Loi 117]Carpentier 118]Locche 119]Gushiken 120]Kane 121]Jersey Joe Walcott 122]Dillon 123]Marshall 124]Graziano 125]Delaney 126]Camacho 127]Sharkey 128]J.Lynch 129]Kingpetch 130]Barry 131]Buchanan 132]Benvenuti 133]Baer 134]Jeanette 135]Kessler 136]Buff 137]Coulon 138]Chandler 139]Dawson 140]Wladimir Klitscko 141]P.Jackson 142]Morales 143]Winky Wright 144]Mosley 145]Blackburn 146]Griffo 147]Kid Berg 148]H.Johnson 149]Elorde 150]Norris 151]Escobar 152]Freddie Steele 153]Azumah Nelson 154]Bud Taylor 155]Accavallo 156]James J Corbett 157]Bivins 158]McFarland 159]Moran 160]Ohba 161]H.Gonzalez 162]JM Marquez 163]Hamed 164]Patterson 165]Kid McCoy 166]McGuigan 167]Freddie Miller 168]Carbajal 169]F.Burns 170]Winstone 171]Levinsky 172]Fullmer 173]McAuliffe 174]E.Pedroza 175]Pintor 176]Coulon 177]Pal Moore 178]Becerra 179]Jung Koo Chang 180]Fenech 181]Honeyghan 182]Collins 183]Qawi 184]John Henry Lewis 185]Eubank 186]Benn 187]Saad Muhammed 188]Bowe 189]Schmeling 190]Turpin 191]Michalczewski 192]Nunn 193]Virgil Hill 194]John L Sullivan 195]Ritchie 196]Barkley 197]Lew Jenkins 198]Chris John 199]Ottke 200]Bute Seen lots of All Time Great top 100's on the net, but never a top 200 ? Update:- Joppy and Pavlik given the boot, replaced by Winky Wright and Bute, could have played safe and picked somebody like Ken Norton instead of Bute ?,Bute last 4 wins over Bika,Berrio,Joppy and Andrade {last 3 for a World title} combined with his career 0 swung it for me. Winky record is much better than i realised so he goes in at 143. Two major movers Lou Ambers whos record is better than i first thought moves up into the top 100 and Sugar Shane Mosley whos record is worse than i thought moves out of the top 100 conviently 1 place behind Winky who to my surprise has beaten Sugar Shane twice. B.Ross moves above Canzoneri as had been pointed out to me, Ross has a 2-0 head to head, although it seems both results were paper thin decisions. The other movements are small to accommodate recent results, Bhops and Manny winning and De La Hoya losing, i did not think JC win over RJJ or Hattons recent win warrented any movement.
Pound for pound Ross and Canzi are still top ten imo. We talking about 3 weight divsion champs, when there was very FEW alpha titles. Before them, only Fitz, and Berg repeated that feat. Than came Ross and Canzi. Not to meeting they each fought a bunch of HOFERS.
Walker is also low at 18 imo. He held the welterweight, middleweight and was rank 3rd in the heavyweight contenders. Thats more than Robinson did pound for pound lol. Walker was marching his way to a title shot, until Schemling put that middleweight in his place. He did more than say a James Toney or even Roy Jones Jr did in the heavyweights(No I dont count that win over Ruiz as a title fight) Walker even held Jack Sharkey to a draw. I know people say Loughran box his eras off, but the 30 min fight film I have, it could have went either way. It was a pretty close tight fight. Thought Loughran edge it by a round. But I can see a Walker victory there.
This list is not a P4P list, it is a ''IM A BETTER BOXER AT MY WEIGHT THAN YOU ARE AT YOUR WEIGHT'' list, for example Sugar Ray Robinson was a better Welterweight than Marciano was a Heavyweight, so he gets ranked above him, Jimmy Wilde was a better Flyweight boxer than Ricardo Lopez was a Straweight boxer so he gets ranked above him. Observations about lists - P4P is crap ?, boxers that spend most of their career at one weight tend to be penalised also it puts Heavyweights at a disadvantage as a fully blown Heavyweight can only operate at that weight. In P4P lists not only do smaller boxers do well, but defeats dont matter, a well known poster on here told me that Pacman could lose to De La Hoya and it would not effect his position in p4p lists unfortunately he is correct, a ranking system that allows boxers to lose and not be downgraded is pathetic, just because that boxer lost to a bigger man. As far as i am concerned if a boxer gets into a ring with another boxer and loses, 9 times out of 10 i would perceive the winner as the better boxer, i cant have he moved up 2 weight divisions and although he lost he should be ranked higher bull****. Sport is about winning, as good as Pacman is he has been beaten 3 times and drawn twice. i bet he will end up with a couple more defeats at the end of his career {like most boxers do} some people are saying he could be a top 20 atg, oh yes a modern boxer who only fights two or three times a year with 5 defeats and 2 draws a top 20 atg ? Thats why i cant have Pacman above Mayweather or Calzaghe. In my mind winning and losing in the ring counts for something. Qawi leads Saad Muhammed 2-0, so i rank Qawi higher Collins leads Eubank 2-0 Collins leads Benn 2-0 Eubank leads Benn 1-0 {and a draw} so i rank Collins,Eubank,Benn McGuigan leads Pedroza 1-0 so i rank McGuigan higher Hatton leads Tszyu 1-0 so i rank Hatton higher {i dont think Tszyu was shot although he retired after the fight} Foreman leads Frazier 2-0 so i rank Foreman higher i use the above examples because a lot of people would rank those boxers the other way i was advised that Ross holds a 2-0 over Canzoneri, so i changed their rankings, once i realised Winky Wright had a 2-0 over Mosley the list was changed. There are lots of examples of boxers having a winning record and still been placed behind the boxer they beat on the list. Terry Norris is still ranked behind Sugar Ray Leonard and Joe Calzaghe is still ranked behind Roy Jones Jnr {although the only reason Calzaghe is listed above Hopkins is due to his win over the executioner,Hopkins is still 80% to 90% prime the same as Calzaghe, i see Calzaghe beating Hopkins at most stages of their careers}. As you can see head to head is not the be all and end all, but i do favour wins in the ring. If anybody knows of boxers on the list who have a winning record over other boxers on the list and are ranked below them let me know ! {as long as it is not Norris/Leonard scenario} Do you notice i like boxers with 0's Marciano,Mayweather,Calzaghe even Dawson,Ottke and Bute { the last 2 are #199 and #200} I just dont like losers, once Dawson and Bute lose i can see them been booted off the list just like Pavlik was, unless Dawson loses to Calzaghe and takes him to the wire he might just stay inside the top 200 {but be demoted}. :thumbsup This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
Come on sweet_scientist lets see your top 200 as i am sure you would be able to make a very reasonable list.
He did a top 100 list before. Still, I dont see 17 people above Walker beating him. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1] Sugar Ray Robinson, Robinson had his problems with the Carman's, and Fullmers, and neither had Walker's power or strength. I highly favor Walker here. 2] Armstrong, WARRRR. MMMM, Ok Walker by ko. 3] Langford, Walker by ko. 4] Greb, Ok Greb beat him. 5] Pep, Walker by ko. He does what Saddler did by ten fore. 6] Duran, again Walker's speed, chin, power, and will will over come any thing Duran has. 7] Wilde, Villia ko Wilde, I belive Walker would do the same. 8] Fitzsimmons, The Gods forbid such a fight from happing. 9] Tunney, Walker repeats what Greb did. 10] Jack Johnson, Walker by ko. 11] Charles, Walker counts Charles and wins. 12] B.Leonard, I give B Leonard this fight, but its close, I see this as a repeat of the Loughran fight, and that was close. 13] R.Leonard, Walker would chase him out of the ring. And badly. If say Hearns gave RL problems, than Walker finishings it. Also Walker's chin will pervent a ko. 14] Louis, Walker would know he would not out slug Louis, so he pulls a Billy Conn, and out points Louis, unlike Conn, Walker had the chin to stay. And assuming the weight in this dream match up. 15] Ali, Yep Walker would kick his butt. And bad. If we took Joe Fraizer, gave him more speed, more power, and more defenses skills, and add a B plan after that(Walker can box, like he did vs Hudking, the guy look like Willie Pep in there) Ali stands no chance. 16] Gans, Gans would lose to Walker also. Gans also had his share of problems with the swarmer types, Bat Nelson was posion to Gans, winning 2 out of 3. 17] Jofre, I relly think Walker could ko him. Jofre always has problems with the swarmers types, as he did vs Harada.
I will provide one later on. It will be pretty much plucked from my rear end, as yours was, but I think it will have more of the guys that SHOULD be there than yours has, even though the accuracy as to their order will be pretty topsy turvy. Not bagging you for having a go, good on you for that, but you are missing a few guys that should be there and putting some up there that don't belong. Get back to you soon.