Hi all This is my list of the top 5 heavyweights from the 1960s to the present time. I have added 6 distinct categories in order to substantiate my ranking with a rating of either: Poor, Average, Above Average, Good, Very Good and Excellent. 1. Muhammad Ali (a) Boxing ability: Excellent (b) Power: Good (c) Chin: Excellent (d) Stamina: Excellent (e) Resume: Excellent (f) Heart: Excellent 2. Larry Holmes (a) Boxing ability: Excellent (b) Power: Good (c) Chin: Very Good (d) Stamina: Excellent (e) Resume: Good (f) Heart: Excellent 3. Lennox Lewis (a) Boxing ability: Very Good (b) Power: Very Good (c) Chin: Good (d) Stamina: Good (e) Resume: Good (f) Heart: Very Good 4. Evander Holyfield (a) Boxing ability: Very Good (b) Power: Good (c) Chin: Good (d) Stamina: Good (e) Resume: Good 5. George Foreman (a) Boxing ability: Above Average (b) Power: Excellent (c) Chin: Very Good (d) Stamina: Above Average (e) Resume: Above Average
Over the same period I have it 1,Ali 2,Holmes 3, Lewis 4, Frazier 5, Tyson I think the order of dominance for their time is a strong indicatior. Frazier cleaned out the house and was universally accepted (once he beat Ali) as being the best if not unbeatable during his time so I feel he deserves to go ahead of other champions who never quite managed to get out of the shadow of other champions within their own era. Tyson too he qualified under this reasoning. Lewis endured. He righted wrongs retiring haven beaten every man he fought so I have him ahead of those who did not right the wrongs. And Larry was the most prolific winner for the longest time, unbeatable until he aged. Ali? Well he’s simply better than the rest.
Your inclusion of Frazier is interesting and there is a powerful argument for him, particularly based upon his performance in the Fight of the Century. However, with Tyson, if he had just defeated Holyfield or Lewis or another "great", I could understand. But the manner in which he lost and his own admission that he never had the heart of a champion leads me to think he would be out of the top 5.
Yes but Tyson was about the most widely accepted “best thing” (at the time) the heavyweight division has ever seen. That rates above others who were not so universally celebrated for dominance. He knocked out who had to be knocked out in order to be considered great at his time. At any one time in history there is a short list who would need to be emphatically knocked out in order for an individual to appear great. Tyson knocked out the names on a short list. Berbick, Thomas, Holmes And Spinks. Out of those who were available he did it. There were no greats to beat, I agree, but that’s why he is no higher than 5. Frazier beat a great, so he’s higher. Ali beat Frazier and Foreman who would be my number 6. Lewis only beat Holyfield but he was not that decisive with him..and it was only Holyfield, a guy who could not destroy old men in Holmes and Foreman and lost to Moorer. I would still rate Evander at number 8, one spot behind Sonny Liston who makes my number 7.
I will have a look for it. It was in an interview he gave when asked if he could beat Ali, he responded by saying "no" and that he was never willing to do what the other [great] fighters were prepared to sacrifice in order to win.
Ali Holmes Wlad Tyson Lewis can really change the order of these 5 as long as Ali remains at 1 Frazier career just a little short for me Foreman got bumped off early in his first title reign then got picked off on the comeback trail. second career while a great achievement had a lot to do with matchmaking.