Top 5 reasons Sam Peter beats Oleg Maskaev

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Brian123, Mar 5, 2008.


  1. Brian123

    Brian123 ESB WORLD CHAMPION Full Member

    2,765
    3
    Feb 16, 2008
    Why only 5 you ask? Because the 25 other reasons would take to long to write!

    1. Maskaev is nearly 40 years old

    2. Has not fought since 2006

    3. Two herniated discs and a bulging disc in the span of a year (if he is 100% he is a medical miracle!)

    4. Matchups/styles make fights and this one is good for Peter

    5. Maskaev has not had a KO in 3 years and can't go the distance out of shape and with a bad back.

    (6. Don King!)

    I like Oleg and Peter is an average fighter at best but this one should be a no-brainer.
     
  2. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    I agree Sammy will win, but I'm leaning towards a TKO.
     
  3. NBT

    NBT Mοderator of Death Full Member

    2,605
    5
    Mar 9, 2006
    I agree, if Peter can't win this one he is an even worse bum than we all already know he is. Maskaev is there for the taking, almost any contender could beat Oleg right now.

    btw Oleg's china chin should definitely be in the top 5, certainly a better reason than "styles make fights" because you can barely describe Peters ring actions as a "style".
     
  4. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Two words: Ring Rust.
    That, and because he has to ko Peter. King won't allow a decision to derail Peter's future earning potential. This will be Maskaev's farewell performance.
     
  5. Brian123

    Brian123 ESB WORLD CHAMPION Full Member

    2,765
    3
    Feb 16, 2008
     
  6. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    I'm a huge Peter fan, but Maskaev should not be overlooked, he still has a ton of power and hasnt lost a fight in years, I believe he has won 11 or 12 straight. Peter should win this fight, but in Boxing, we all know weird **** can happen. I got it 70/30 for Peter, and I am perdicting a early knockout for Peter, who looks to be great shape and ready for the challenge at hand.
     
  7. petrozza

    petrozza The Great Visionary Full Member

    1,168
    0
    Mar 6, 2006
    Maskaev has not had a KO in 3 years? :lol::lol::lol:

    I guess you forgot Maskaev vs. Rahman II in 2006.... bad math or bad memory? or both?
     
  8. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    Up until the McCline fight, I would have favoured Peter by a mile. I've cut that down to half a mile, now that Peter has been shown to have questionable whiskers (being bounced off the canvas and nearly knocked out by a light hitter is not a good sign) and due to the fact that Peter has almost no defence at all.

    Still, Maskaev is old, inactive, chinny and looked horrible in his last fight. It would take a miracle for him to win. A lot depends on their respective conditioning on the night; I don't trust Peter not to come in with a pot-belly and get his head turned into a water-balloon.
     
  9. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    McCline is a hard hitter early in fights.
     
  10. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    Ahem. Maskaev beat Rahman by knockout. Top reason your system is flawed.

    He also beat livin Castillo by knockout, and it was less than 3 years ago.

    Care to try again?
     
  11. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Exactly, he put down then IBF champ Chris Bryd with one punch, Brock, Briggs, Peter, and Grant. He is far from light hitter early in fights, it's only later when he fatigues, does his power start to deplete.
     
  12. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    I think everyone is overlooking the Vegas Strip Club and buffet factors.

    ive got maskaev on a close pts victory. i expect a split decision by the judges however.
     
  13. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    Correction: he's a harder hitter early in fights, because after 4 or 5 rounds he's spent, like most boxers of his build.

    If he is a big hitter early in fights, then he must not land much early in fights, considering that only 23 of his fights have ended by stoppage. That brings us back to the inescapable conclusion: Peter has no defence worth talking about except falling on his ass.

    Now, if we can all agree that Maskaev is a much harder hitter in any round than McCline, then a lot will depend on (a) whether Maskaev has enough left to get off big punches and not get KO'd himself, and (b) whether Peter has bothered to learn how to block and slip punches. If it is (b), then the heavyweight division better watch out.
     
  14. petrozza

    petrozza The Great Visionary Full Member

    1,168
    0
    Mar 6, 2006
    If this goes to the scorecards, it's 100% in favor of Peter. Maskaev can win only by KO. Gotta land that uppercut and send Peter back to Nigeria....
     
  15. petrozza

    petrozza The Great Visionary Full Member

    1,168
    0
    Mar 6, 2006
    Peter was also bleeding against the light-hitting Toney and the fat middleweight had him stunned on a least one occasion.