I forgot about Baer vs Levinsky! That was for real if anything was. No headgear either. What was the deal with these affairs? Was there a code or Were the opponents double crossed? Did they start out friendly sessions that turned nasty? Or did everyone know ahead that it was a real fight but that because the commission was not involved there would be no announced decision?
1 - Joe Louis (1) 2 - Rocky Marciano (2) 3 - Sonny Liston (3) 4 - Ezzard Charles (4) 5 - Floyd Patterson (7) 6 - Jersey Joe Walcott (6) 7 - Max Schmeling (5) 8 - Max Baer (9) 9 - Elmar Ray (43) 10 - Jack Sharkey (13) 11 - Archie Moore (12) 12 - Jimmy Bivins (18) 13 - Ingemar Johansson (9) 14 - Harold Johnson (14) 15 - Zora Folley (20) 16 - Eddie Machen (15) 17 - Bob Pastor (25) This content is protected 19 - Tommy Loughran (17) 20 - Ernie Schaaf (23) This content is protected 22 - Joey Maxim (27) 23 - Larry Gains (26) 24 - Rex Layne (19) 25 - Steve Hamas (21) 26 - James J Braddock (30) This content is protected 28 - Arturo Godoy (31) This content is protected 30 - Nino Valdes (30) 31 - Tommy Jackson (32) This content is protected 33 - Bob Baker (37) This content is protected Not too bad really, disagreement wise. Only five real disagreements, probably only three very serious ones.
Well, I think in the case of the Louis fights with Toles and the others in 1935, it was probably that boxing "exhibitions" were staged as such in the early days to circumvent a law against "prize fights." But as the years passed, boxing became much more popular and acceptable, and so the anti-prize fight law just fell into the blue law class. The authorities had better things to do than enforce a law that no one cared about concerning a sporting event. But the legislature hadn't yet passed a new law. So real fights were "exhibitions." For folks outside the USA, the laws governing boxing were state laws, so there were 48 separate laws, which creates a lot of confusion for modern folks trying to push definitions into a one size fits all box. I wonder why the Baer-Levinsky fight just wasn't a sanctioned title fight? Baer was the champion and Levinsky a contender. Why fight an exhibition? Possibly it was just going to be a "go through the motions" exhibition but the two lost their heads. Anyone know what the situation was?
No it doesn’t count. It wasn’t a real fight. Fighters often held back in exhibitions. Glorified sparring sessions. Find me one record book which lists Valdes Louis as an official pro fight
If there was judges present at the exhibition, then technically it was a pro bout. No judges were present at most of Louis exhibitions
Big disagreement with Ray it seems. Why so low at 43? He defeated prime versions of Walcott and Charles at age 36
Ah sorry! I thought you had him at 43!! I couldn't figure wtf you were up to. I have him at 9, you have him at 10. I'll update.
No worries here is our list again 1--Joe Louis 2--Rocky Marciano 3--Sonny Liston 4--Ezzard Charles 5--Max Schmeling 6--Jersey Joe Walcott 7--Floyd Patterson 8--Max Baer 9--Ingemar Johansson 10--Elmer Ray 11--Billy Conn 12--Archie Moore 13--Jack Sharkey 14--Harold Johnson 15--Eddie Machen 16--Primo Carnera 17--Tommy Loughran 18--Jimmy Bivins 19--Rex Layne 20--Zora Folley 21--Steve Hamas 22--Nino Valdes 23--Ernie Schaaf 24--Lou Nova 25--Bob Pastor 26-- Larry Gains 27--Joey Maxim 28--Lee Q Murray 29--Turkey Thompson 30--Jimmy Braddock 31--Joe Baksi 32-- Hurricane Jackson 33--Melio Bettina 34--Clarence Henry 35--Roscoe Toles 36--Bob Satterfield 37--Bob Baker 38--Tommy Farr 39--Lee Savold 40--Paulino Uzcuden 41--Arturo Godoy 42--Buddy Baer 43--John Holman 44--Walter Neusel 45--Henry Cooper 46--Roy Harris 47--Lem Franklin 48--Alberto Lovell 49--Roland Lastarza 50--Tami Mauriello
Looks like lastarza is our biggest disagreement then. Roland has the type of record when you look closely you see it was overrated. His entire career was prrtty much based off nearly beating Marciano in 1950, marcianos first fight back from the vingo tragedy. The rest of his career is pedestrian... He beat number 2 rated layne in 1953, but most of the papers and myself believe layne won. Layne was also erratic by this point losing as often as he was winning. He spit 1-1 with Dan Bucceroni, a good but not great contender of the era. He beat Brion in a stinker, the New York Times ripped into both men He went 1-1 with club fighter Rocky Jones. These fights really put into question lastarza. Jones dominated him in the first bout. In the 2nd bout, Lastarza was floored and beaten up the first two rounds. I have a few sources who stated in between rounds, Jones was told to “cool it” by the mob, because he was going to destroy a planned lastarza Marciano title fight. He never beat any of the outstanding contenders of the era....Moore, Valdes, Charles, Henry, Johnson, baker, satterfield, Jackson, Walcott, Louis, and Holman. He basically rode the coat tails of the first Marciano fight to keep his high rating. His manager screamed robbery for three years, until Marciano rematches him to provide any doubt of superiority. During that time, he turned down a lot of big fights with contenders, fought mostly B level fighters and struggled when he stepped up in competition. Post Marciano title fight, the rest of his career was an absolute disaster We still included him because he was a good boxer who almost took the “0” from Marciano, but We don’t believe he accomplished enough based on our criteria to rate higher
I think you confused our list with the other one that was posted, because I think you are replying to us. We didn't disagree that much on Elmer Ray. We ranked him 10th. Nor Carnera. We ranked him 16th. You didn't color Valdes, but he had a pretty big drop. I hope you and Suzie debate your placement of LaStarza above Valdes. That should create fireworks. Why did you rate Roland above Nino, if I might ask? Jack Sharkey--I think a reasonable rating. He was the champion, and beat guys like Wills and Godfrey. What weakened him for us was the dubious quality of his win over Schmeling. But there are a lot of disputed decisions out there and I can see just accepting the official verdict for everyone. It was just that this decision is on film and seems more questionable than most. But I have no big dispute with you on Sharkey. Maxie Rosenbloom--I didn't think he did enough at heavy to overcome some bad losses like twice to Hank Hankinson. He did finish strong, with a win over a young Nova, and a draw with Pastor. I just didn't think that he did as much at heavy as our other guys either in quality or quantity. Neusel--interesting. Why that high? Farr--Ok. I can see that rating. Nova--two big stoppages of Baer put him higher for me, but he did fall quite a bit after the Louis fight. Layne, Hamas, Schaaf, Maxim, Gains--these guys were all close. What I went with to separate them was that the champions they defeated were at or near the top of the heavyweight division at the time. Gains beat Schmeling as an unknown teenager. Maxim beat Patterson when Floyd was a teenage prospect weighing 164. I rated Layne first among this group because his wins against Walcott and Charles were when they were top men. I can certainly see an argument for Hamas above Layne as Hamas beat everyone he fought. I think only Marciano matches that on our list.
I am only referring to the 1935 fights which The Ring Record Book (and by the way, other writers of the time like Paul Gallico) accepted as real fights. The late forties fights, and the Johnny Davis affair in 1944, were truly exhibitions, even if occasionally these were shooting matches for some reason. I agree with you that they shouldn't weigh in the balance. The Toles fight of 1935 is a different issue.
Finally... Louis Marciano Liston Charles Walcott Sharkey Schmeling Patterson Johansson Moore Loughran Baer m Johnson Bivins Maxim Ray Folley Machen Pastor Thompson Murray Schaff Henry Poreda Baker Farr Mauriello Godoy Stribling Rosenbloom Lovell Toles Baski Nova Layne Valdez Lewis Cooper Jackson Neusel Gains Harris Pastrano Uzcuden Savold Bettina Lesnevich Sys Tangberg Retzlaff
Yeah suzy thankfully straitened that up with me above. Thankfully. Who has Ray at 40? Brion, Layne, Bucceroni and Jones plus that first brilliant tilt at the Rock, I think that's quite pretty. Appraising Rosenbloom is desperate. What to make of his 1931 loss to Manley, for example? But Rosenbloom, I think, deserved the nod against Pastor. He beat Al Ettore, Lou Nova, Lee Ramage and King Levinsky as well as besting title challenger John Henry Lewis in an often dull series at heavyweight. I think he did enough to get in despite the strangeness. 30-0-2 up front is very nice, and when he hit American shores (From memory) he beat King Levinsky who was in absolutely inspired form when they met and he landed that razor thin victory over Tommy Loughran. Chuck in two wins over Peterson and Heuser and I think he just about survives the prime losses to Carnera, Farr and Schmeling.