Excellent post, you are what you say you are; if people want to get technical, one theory is we are all Ethiopian.
Thanks for replying. I agree Paterson deserves recognition, in fact he is fourth on my all time Scottish list behind Buchanan, Lynch & Watt and just in front of Walter McGowan. I just feel he lost too many fights to be considered, especially against weak opposition. Whether he had weak mentality of not I don't know. I realise losses aren't all that determine a fighter, but he on average lost 1 out of every 3 fights he ever fought. That nudges him below superior talents in my eyes in Lynch and Buchanan.
That is probably a fair point, but to play Devils Advocate, Paterson did rise to the occasion in the big fights. But I take your point; he probably did too often, fight down to the level of less superior opposition.
Langford was not born of Canadian parents, didn't learn his boxing in Canada and left as soon as he was able. I consider him Canadian. I mean what was Bugner? Hungarian, British, Australian? Bob Fitz? Born England, reared New Zealand, formative boxing Australia, American citizen. Consistency needed and for me, where you are born decides the nationality. But I can live with an opposing view.
From fighters Ive seen I`ll give you 2 from my side of the pond & 2 which should never be disputed from the other side.... My side - Scotland - Ken Buchanan Wales - Joe Calzaghe Other side - Panama - Roberto Duran Nicaragua - Alexis Arguello :thumbsup
algeria- Marcell Cerdan scotland- Benny Lynch or Ken Buchanan wales- Jimmy Wilde england- Bob Fitzimmons Ireland- 'Non-Pareil' Jack Dempsey