@Frank I get it.. Your edgy and cool because you go against the general public on who they view, so you have convinced me to change my list. My new top 5. 1.Charlie Zelenoff 2.Chuck Wempner 3.Deontay Wilder 4.Lou Bizzarro 5.Tony Galento
y u need so many accounts ? u did not rili get it , and i do not feel like repeating myself now , i did already . u have no answer 2 my answer .
I think there is nothing wrong with the five you have chosen based upon your criteria i'm fine with it. I disagree that Armstrong is excluded and also think that you could include Ali, as you say. Charles?
2nd try : 1. Peter North 2. Ben Dover 3. Seymore Butts 4. Alex Sanders 5. Nacho Vidal how m i dis taim ?
You're right, I didn't give you a list of fighters with better resumes, better skills, better legacies, better longevity, and better big wins. That is why I changed my list, I understood that those fighters I named just absolutely suck and their greatness is total fabrications, Instead I now understand that 5 fighters that rank along the lower end of the top 100(top 50 for Toney and McCallum) are better. In fact that is why I was inspired to find even less impressive boxers to be even edgyer and cooler..
I find it amusing i get mentioned in his list of terrible posters. judgiong by the company in that list, I'm gonna take it as a compliment :good
No, I think they are too. I think he is a vastly improved poster all kidding aside, since he actually started watching the fights.
I don't think Louis even comes close to top 5 status. Mine would be: Langford Robinson Greb Armstrong Ezzard Charles For me Charles has to be 5th and round out the top 5. :deal
the thing I like most about Frank is his attitude to the sport. McCall is his goat because "at best you have a chance of pot shotting your way to a draw" quality stuff