i do not rank myself within d lufcrazy scale , but if 4ced 2 extend it , a lighter hitting Ivan Calderon is still not good enough comparison 2 my lufcrazyness
BTW , there's another way 2 measure it , integrating over your vcash as a real function of time as a variable : S (vcash(t)*t) dt with your join date being d left border and current date being d right border . but there is a more sophisticated formula , with vcash(t) replaced by 0 4 non betting members or members whom bet less than 6 times in a year
You win me over with your talk of maths. However you assume that bets are always made with the intention of winning. I bet all mine on malignaggi knocking out khan because I was drunk and felt lucky. I've not really bet since. Still though, I love the maths
This flawed system allowed and allows u 2 fully reverse your mistake , which makes your loss all d more telling . Notice I do not follow d sport like most general forum posters and a few classic members do , but still . And all of my bets were on "boxing" events .
And then 1 can simply measure his kok's n egs' common volume and it will indic8 on his .. well :yep . I believe that there is a significant positive corel8ion between this volume , vcash and replies here .