Top Five Greatest Fighters Ever

yeah I know I just cba recapturing my wealth.

I could start betting again but why?

 

I'm actually very surprised that you know what integration is as it's a higher skill not taught at school level and not fully understood until university level.

 

My 5 greatest

Rocky Marciano
Ricardo Lopez
Joe Calzaghe
Floyd Mayweather jr.
Sven Ottke

Just outside: Khaosai Galaxy, Jack McAuliffe

 

Louis's domination isn't questionable. the length has an asterix due to the war but his era was as strong as any other and he dominated it.

 

depends . maybe where u r it is not .

where i came from it was "taught" in high school 2 some .

I know that in most universities in d world , B.Sc. in math is absolutely gutter level , including most of d highest regarded 1s .

 

where's Joe Mesi ?

 

well I have a 1st so I'm at the top of the gutter I guess. went as far as ring theory and tensors.

 

this is not gutter level really , but probably did not go deep in2 them .

but there r other subjects , more necessary than d above .

did u learn : abstract set theoretic topology , functions of 1 complex variable , elementary measure theory , axiomatic logic , axiomatic set theory ? all of them r necessary according 2 me .

any of them lacking and i do not recognize a university's authority 2 grant B.Scs

on paper u r better than i , because i made a temporary tactical retreat after being close 2 finishing my B.Sc. and moved 2 computer sciences 4 future money's sake .

i could have finished my degree with some 70 something average but since it was not enough 4 me , i 4feited it there and may some day back 2 it somewhere else .

 

It is, IMO. :deal

 

Never won a world title.

 

Always ?
Well, then you definitely can´t rate Louis high.....literally dozens of fighters have better resumes....

 

yeah axiomatic logic < axiomatic set theory < ring theory. functions are lower level anyways and didn't belong in the same sentence tbh. I assume you mean complex as "i" not as difficult also?

I was offered a phd but couldn't accept for monetary reasons hence I went into teaching.

I scored 70.14 as I did no more than necessary to get the top mark.

 

For me resume and achievement are worth the same. h2h is like a tie breaker.

 

they let u continue 2 phd with 70.14 ?? low level it is .
i did less than necessary so u did more than i 4 sure i promise :yep

if u studied 2 advanced (4 1st degree) courses it still does not make up 4 u missing and lacking in basic knowledge .

so your university let u take 2 advanced (4 1st degree) courses and d rest of your studies were mainly gutter level .

This is how it's done , a Muhammad Ali style B.Sc.

 

It was statistics based research and I scored 99% overall in that. I did very poor in cryptography and I didn't really bother with my dissertation.

I've done maths all my life, I teach it for a living. My basic knowledge is complete my friend.