Top Ten 175 Pounders?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Dec 5, 2014.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    Can a reasonable case be made that these men are the best?
    In no order.

    Langford
    Charles
    Tunney
    Fitzsimmons
    Moore
    Foster
    Spinks
    Conn
    Loughran
    Johnson
    On the bench:
    Choynski, Lewis, Jones,Delaney.
    N B I have Greb at middleweight, [number one].
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    Very difficult to presume that Langford is among the best, with the limited footage, although i've sympathy with that point of view. There's very little footage of Charles at LHW too. A tiny bit of Conn.

    Are you saying that you think Fitzsimmons is one of the best ever at 175, based upon footage you've seen?
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yes.
     
  4. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,252
    Sep 27, 2011
    But footage of all except Foster and Spinks is between fairly limited and non-existent, so would you leave them out regardless of their obvious accomplishments?

    I know some don't agree but I think Greb does belong on a 175lb list. He was good enough to beat two men named here, so surely he warrants a place among them.

    But otherwise a tough list to argue with.
     
  5. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    Kovalev and Berbiev will be on this list in a few years
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well if someone asks me for names specific to best, which McVey has done, I wouldn't name fighters I hadn't seen/hadn't seen very much of at all. So, yes. Accomplishments and quality are obviously linked, but it's reasonable to say that based upon what footage is available, Ike Ibeabuchi would beat Tommy Burns. Who achieved more?

    But as Unforgiven has said, an argument can be made - one can be constructed and it could be reasonable. Even "best" is interpretable.

    If the question is who looks best though, the most literal interpretation, then I'd pick Andre Ward to beat Fitzsimmons, for example. Based upon the footage.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    No, I am saying that at around 175lbs or less Langford and Fitzsimmons ko'd very good heavyweights.Fitzsimmons, as lhvy champ didn't accomplish much, yet at the weight, or less, it was where he did his best work, ditto Langford,imo
    I have never seen Greb ,but never the less , I rank him number one at middleweight.I haven't seen more than clips of Tunney as a light heavy yet I rate him among the best at the weight, it's just my perception.
     
  8. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    maybe they need to achieve something first.
     
  9. The General

    The General Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,214
    17
    Aug 29, 2014
    Kovalev has already acheived

    and Beterbiev is a two time olympian and world and european champion every little helps:good
     
  10. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Kovalev is on his way dont get me wrong but he still has some way to go.

    Beterbiev? European champion? The worlds full of European champions.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    No ,only Europe.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm not sure what the problem is ,for example Langford at around175lbs,[his optimum weight according to Moyle,] beat many of the top heavyweights of his time,I havent seen him koing them should I therefore ignore his work? Fitz beat the hell out of Jeffries face when he was 39 years old,scaling 172lbs.

    I don't think you are being intentionally pedantic but it comes across that way:huh
     
  13. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    I get the argument for both including and not including Sam in the LHW rankings. Personally, I'm on the fence about it.

    Yes, he could compete with much bigger fighters while fighting under the LHW limit. Still, he was technically competing at heavyweight for much of his career.

    I suppose it'd be kind of like if someone wanted to rank Ezzard, Dempsey, Marciano, etc. at Cruiserweight. I don't know if I'd do it, but using in-ring weights, the shoe fits.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well you said "best". Best, tends to mean how good someone is at doing something, literally. What i'm saying is, it's hard for me to understand how someone can say that someone they've never seen boxing at a given weight can be best at something if you've never seen them boxing at that weight, or haven't seen much of them boxing at that weight.

    But I think you are using the word "best" like most people use "greatest", maybe.

    So, Fitz is unquestionably very great at 175lbs, but Hopkins would pretty clearly beat him based upon the film we have. So Hopkins is a better 175lb fighter, but Fitz is greater, if you like.
     
  15. kovalevtheGoat

    kovalevtheGoat The Chelyabinsk Machine banned Full Member

    5,600
    78
    Jul 28, 2014
    Sergey Kovalev is number 1.