Toughest schedule - Pacquaio or Mayweather?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SirKillalot, Dec 30, 2011.


  1. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Nah:lol: Why would I be mad *****? Pac hasn't been exposed outside of being a great fighter..... And please don't talk about "hittin my ass" sea biscuit. Leave the bed room talk to Floyd. How about that bid Floyd is going to do in Clark county?..... You mad?:shock::|
     
  2. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    "rose colored lens"......get off ur knees and wipe your chin. You floored Mich?:rofl
     
  3. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Floyd will be looked as the greater fighter when their careers are over. The only chance Pac has of usurping Floyd in that manner is if they fight. I mean we all know Floyd kicks his ass, but thats his only hope.

    When all is said and done, there will be no arguing over resume or any of that, people will look back and say, who had the most skills, who was the most versatile, who was the more polished fighter who dominated his opposition.


    And they'll say Floyd. It is what it is. Pac should have avoided Marquez. He was exposed as all Floyd fans said he would be when he came up agianst a versatile opponent. Not the top ranks stiffs he's been fighting.
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007

    way to twist it *****. i asked which future ATG floyd has fought in his prime and you answered marquez. when i asked you if marquez was prime when he fought floyd, you would answer with an irrelevant one. and for the record, pac fought marquez twice in his best weights at 126 and 130 while in marquez' prime.

    and you are a double idiot if you think the morales that fought diaz was the same morales that beat pacquiao. morales is much a greater fighter than castilllo was *****.

    you are three times an idiot if you think marquez was floyd's leftover. if that's your reasoning why floyd has a tougher resume, then why is floyd fighting maidana's leftover, cotto's leftover, pac's leftover and mosley's leftover?

    floyd has not a bad resume. but compared to pac, it seems like a stroll in the park. and pac has done way much more in what they were first given.
     
  5. Kid Cincinnati

    Kid Cincinnati GOOD BOY NATION Full Member

    5,636
    7
    Sep 9, 2010
    WTF, I just noticed that the ****** in your avatar isn't even wearing a shirt.

    Anyway, which fighter has cleaned out superfeather and then moved up and cleaned out welter? Pac's schedule is balls to the wall ATG. Floyd's is good, but play it safe.
     
  6. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    :rofl Drink that "kool-aid". Floyd will be appreciated as one of the best technical defensive boxers out generation has produced but in terms of "greatness" ? :lol: Floyd doesn't come close to the depth Manny has in his career.... The actual meat to any legacy is who you have beaten and Pac has beaten everyone....in other divisions outside his natural weight and has made history doing so. That's substance...... To Floyds credit..... He is undefeated and I hear he's a "g" which seems to mean a lot to you *****s.

    And why should Pac avoid Juan?:blood.. Because he's a great fighter who is a proven challenge to Pac? Pac is not one to duck a fight and his resume proves it. That kind of mentality says a lot about why you have such a warped point of view. Pac has an incredible trilogy with Juan.......something ALL the greats have with another fellow great fighters. Floyd barely has a great fighter on his resume besides DLH and Mosley which are his best wins happening a few yrs ago. Joe C. had a similar career where be faced Nard and Hopkins at the end of his career which where his best wins..... But Hop gave Joe some substance based on his performances after Joe retired. I don't think Shane will be pulling off anything close to what Hopkins has.
     
  7. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    Do we really need another thread to expose MichiganWarrior's (and fellow *****s) nuthuggery?

    I mean everybody knows Pac has the better resume and it's not even close.
    Even the worst fans of FMJ know this.
    And they also know it doesn't take anything out of FMJ's superior talent either.
     
  8. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    like.:good
     
  9. str1

    str1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,106
    263
    May 8, 2006


    ***** alert! :rofl


    Anyone with their right mind would agree that Pac has the better resume wether you like him or not. And this bull**** excuse that Pac fights leftovers is just that..an excuse from Floyd now used by his nuthuggers. Its boxing and in boxing you are bound to fight guys with loses. So everyone with a loss is suppose to retire because then they will be consired "leftovers"? So SRL was Duran's leftover when he fought Hearns who was Hagler's leftover who fought Duran who was Hearns leftover? :verysad

    Mayweather resume could of helped if he somehow he would of fought Tszyu and Cotto but even then I see Pac resume still better.