Trevor Berbick v Michael Spinks

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus, Jan 7, 2020.


  1. Eye of Timaeus

    Eye of Timaeus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,893
    1,187
    Sep 1, 2019
    I'll take Spinks by a comfortable decision here. Thoughts?
     
  2. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,122
    44,822
    Mar 3, 2019
    Spinks wide UD12 or 15
     
    Fergy likes this.
  3. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,056
    35,392
    Jan 8, 2017
    Spinks on points, he'd have Berbick frustration showing by the second round.
     
  4. GOAT Primo Carnera

    GOAT Primo Carnera Member of the PC Fan Club Full Member

    2,665
    2,683
    Jan 28, 2018
    This wouldn´t be that one sided for Spinks.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,867
    24,623
    Jan 3, 2007
    If Spinks and Berbick had met in 1986 I’d fair Michael to win a decision... If the 1981-1982 version of Trevor showed up then it’s 50/50.
     
  6. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,652
    4,374
    Jul 14, 2009
  7. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,493
    3,075
    Feb 17, 2008
    If they would have fought in that 85 or 86 timeframe, I'd have gone with clever Trevor.

    I think he would have muscled his way inside and Spinks would not do anything fighting with his back on the ropes.
    berbick would force Spinks straight back so Michael would not be able to circle and pause and take his breathers on the outside. By the 4th round it is a strength bout and that is a huge advantage for Berbick.

    I wanted to see this bout, but we got other Spinks bouts instead---but not the Bruno's or Witherspoon's or Berbick's or Williams. The way the Spinks opponent selection process was, we would have got a basic guy on a losing streak like say, david Bey.