Trinidad de la Hoya: Harold Lederman's scorecard...

Just to reiterate. Lederman is horrible at scoring fights.

Any fight that is not completely one sided you can almost guarantee he will score wrong.

'I gotta tell ya Jim, this fighter was taking loads of punches to the face but he was walking forward while doing it, I scored the round for him on effective aggresion'

 

Lederman has sucked for a long time.

 

LOL, the thing i like about ledermen is his catchphrases. everytime lampley asks him how he is scoring the fight he says "OK Jim I have it.......(name of fighter"

 

I am in the minority on this one, but I didn't see a robbery. A lot of the De La Hoya pity pat, "ah ah ah" looked and sounded good, but a lot did not land. I thought Tito won 115-113. I was rooting for De La Hoya too.

 

Tito might of won the last 3, but Oscar easily won 8-4 schooling and exposing Tito. Was a glorified sparring, but Tito got owned. Thanks to Don King Tito got the victory.

 

Pity Pat is better than landing nothing at all

 

Oscar simply thought he was way ahead in the scorecards which he should of been. Even he,said Quartey was a harder fight than Trinidad and he was right. Tito winning was nonsense. Clearly lost to Delahoya.

 

Lederman sometimes gets it wrong.

 

Lederaman has got to be one of the worst judges in boxing history, though I thought he was in range for the DLH-Trinidad fight.


Want to know about a horrific Lederman scorecard that involved DLH?

116-111, 116-111, and 117-110 are how the official judges scored DLH vs John John Molina.
I forget his exact score, but Lederman had Molina winning by a point or a draw vs DLH! atsch

Lederman is just clueless!

 

i dont get why people say oscar was running for the last couple of rounds. It looked exactly like the way ray leonard and ali fought. I guess they're bad too huh?

 

Don King owned the judges although it was a split decision. Oscar outboxed Tito easily.

 

Whoever says this was not a robbery needs to log off and never watch boxing again, for their eyes deceive them and the mind disbelieves.

 

Just watched this again.

I had it 7-5 Oscar. Giving Tito 4, 9, 10, 11, 12. I think Oscar made a conscious decision to run in the 9th. He started really well and began exchanging with Tito who obviously had more left in the tank and had more sting on his shots. I think that's he moment he figured he'd already done enough.

I can't for the life of me see how the 5th can be scored to Tito, I don't understand that one at all. The first was kinda close but again it's a bit of a stretch giving that Tito. 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 were all clear Oscar rounds. I think 1 and 5 were close Oscar rounds.

It's not the worst decision I've seen but it is one I can't agree with.

 

7-5 Oscar and thats being generous to Tito.

Oscar won that fight, anyone who says otherwise either DKSAB, was under Don King's Payroll or is just a biased Rican.

:deal