Who has the better resume Felix Trinidad or Juan Manuel Marquez (so far)? Who will go down greater in history?
ATM which is rightfully to be called for. It's Trinidad, But I won't down on Marquez. He has only good names late of his career. And not much to talk about cept Pac and him. Finito let me fix your post... He needs to go more far to be greater.
Negative Janjalani..... Marquez has already passed Tito on the ATG list.. Tito beat an old Sweet Pea which is nothing.... Beat Vargas who's not an ATG fighter.. maybe not even a HOF fighter... Got schooled by HOya yet received the greatest gift of his life.. Got schooled even worse by Hops... This doesnt sound like a greater fighter than Marquez...
Tito ! Marquez's claim to fame are his close fights with Pacman in which he has not escaped with a W yet. Barrera was done, Juan Diaz already beat up by Nate Campbell, an L to CHRIS JOHN ?????........... Tito by FAR !
I bet to disagree sir, Tito has his legacy cemented already. He may have won and lost to greater people and lesser people, but he is considered as a Legend which Marquez is not at the moment. If he is not, then why do people still speak about him. Marquez CAN top up Tito's career, But for that he needs to strive more harder than ever. And I assure you that Father Time is against him. He needs something more defining win than any other fighters have accomplished so far. And that sir is no easy task. But I do hope he succesfuly do it.
Jotio i really don't thinky you would call Barrera shot if you had seen the fight. He was not at his best but he was clearly not shot and he is going to have further achievments by sparking Khan.
I'm a Trinidad fan, but my vote is most definitely for Marquez. What a beatiful boxer! Did you see the way he dismantled Juan Diaz? The kid looked terrific and was fighting quite well, but that was nothing to JMM! JMM = GREAT boxer. Any losses in the future will be the result of too much weight climbing to make $$ but NOT because of his quality as a fighter....
U just dont know **** do u? Even KMSTAR who's a Tito fan says that Marquez is greater... Who the **** r u?
Marquez has better skills of course, but his resume is not better than Tito's, not at this point. I don't even see how this is even in question -- in fact this threads existence doesn't even make sense. You guys are going to make Marquez a hated man, by the degree at which people are going overboard with him now after beating someone like Diaz.
Doesn't matter who I am... Your judgments on Tito's resume appeared as though you know very little in regards tito's victories and what they meant at the time. He beat more than just a old pea and vargas. What you are doing is bias nonsense. I can do the same thing with Marquez resume and at the end of the day there are more holes in Marquez resume then there is Tito's.