Trout v Bradley

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by The Kirwan Kid, Jul 9, 2013.


  1. The Kirwan Kid

    The Kirwan Kid Member Full Member

    349
    3
    Jul 21, 2010
    In my opinion these 2 are both very good boxers that everyone seems to hate on. A fight between the 2 of them would be a good match up IMO. Thoughts?
     
  2. HitBattousai

    HitBattousai Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,076
    11
    May 6, 2006
    Noooo. Even though Trout isn't a puncher at Light Middleweight, he's just way too big for Bradley and there's nothing Bradley throws that Trout would have any fear of. Bradley's punching power at Welterweight is very weak as it stands, at Light Middleweight it would be feather-duster level. In a P4P sense, he's clearly better than Trout in my view but Light Middleweight isn't a class he should be joining.
     
  3. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Trout would easily beat Bradley.

    Weight divisions exist in boxing.
     
  4. bigstinkybug

    bigstinkybug Member Full Member

    496
    2
    Jul 10, 2010
    Trouts too good... too big...too strong... maybe Cotto isn't what he once was, but he simply got manhandled by Trout. Cotto didn't belong in the same ring with him.
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,283
    9,867
    Jun 23, 2008
    Trout would beat Timmy by a very wide margin.
     
  6. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    Bradley should be fighting at 140 and you want him to fight a guy who's 171 on fightnight?
     
  7. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,761
    338
    Aug 4, 2007
    Tim is a small ww. His ideal weight is probably lww. Too big of a size difference. But lol at people saying Trout is just better. Tim might not look pretty doing it but you can't question his resume. Tim is the better fighter and boxer.