True, Or, False. Do The Klitschkos Have An Unfair Size Advantage Over Their Opponent?

This was never talked about when

This content is protected

was fighting, there were massive reach and height advantages for him.

 

They do have an advantage....but whether it is unfair or not isnt really their fault, nonetheless i voted true

 

Spot on:happy

 

They do have an unfair advantage, but it ain't their fault

 

No.

A fighter has to make the most with what he has. There's been plenty of 6'5+ fighters in history who never made the most of their size advantage.

 

No.

 

False. It's obviously an advantage, but it's not unfair, no more than asking if people who are more naturally athletic or have faster reflexes than others have an "unfair advantage."

 

aw crap my bad, I meant to select no but selected yes. obviously the rules of heavyweight are anyone over 200LBS they're fair game. there have been many other boxers with their height and weight who haven't done ****, the klits are very athletically gifted for men of their size

 

Its just like Usain Bolt in the sprint races. Advantage? Yes. Unfair? Nobody sayin so!

 

No, I don't think they have an unfair advantage.

If only size mattered, people like Julius Long and Nikolai Valuev would be champs.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaHFnVT_nMc[/ame]

 

Of course. There best asset are there height and size. Same with lewis. How do you think Nikolai Sergeyevich valuev became champion. Unlike valuev they do have skills which is why there unstopable.

 

Nobody is crying unfair.

 

Exhibit A:

This content is protected

 

Ask Primo Carners, Jess Willard, Valuev, etc. if sized mattered. Hell Carnera and Willard were almost beat to death by guys they dwarfed.