1. No version of Saad Muhammad defeats Qawi. 2. Lennox Lewis must be downgraded historically because no legitimate great loses to people named Oliver McCall and Hasim Rahman while in his prime. 3. In another ten years, Mike Tyson's legacy of greatness will improve and his placement among the ATG's will also move up accordingly. 4. Julio Cesar Chavez is the greatest fighter to hail from Mexico. 5. The point of origin for the demise of quality in world-class boxing can be traced to the 1980's. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Franklin KOs Braxton Chavez is not the greatest. SANCHEZ The demise can be traced to the scaflaw Suleiman when he went to 12 from 15. A kneejerk reaction by a pjerk. Day before weigh in was the killing KO deathstroke. The demise of all the Victory Sports Series boxing mags didn't help
2, 3, and 4 are False, I believe. Not so sure about 1 and 5. But I tend to believe 5 is probably True.
My own answers: 1: True. Saaf may very well be the better, more accomplished career fighter (not sure about that, but it could be argued), but he never beats Qawi. He was a stationary, "over-the-top" attacker, and Qawi was adept and rolling under and up inside those big, wide punches. He eats Saad for breakfast every time they fight. Terrible styles matchup for Matthew. 2: Don't know. They're heavyweights, so who cares? 3: Probably true, but see #2 for additional clarification. 4: True 5: False.
1. No version of Saad Muhammad defeats Qawi. True 2. Lennox Lewis must be downgraded historically because no legitimate great loses to people named Oliver McCall and Hasim Rahman while in his prime. False 3. In another ten years, Mike Tyson's legacy of greatness will improve and his placement among the ATG's will also move up accordingly. Probably false 4. Julio Cesar Chavez is the greatest fighter to hail from Mexico. Could be argued either way 5. The point of origin for the demise of quality in world-class boxing can be traced to the 1980's. I reject the premise.
Nice thread with suitably provocative questions! Here are my answers: 1. False 2. True 3. True 4. False 5. True
1.True 2.False 3.False 4.Agree, though if it not for Sanchez early death he might well have superceded Chavez 5.False
1. False 2. False 3. True 4. False....Salvador Sanchez is the answer. 5. True...the 80's was when that shameful Mexican baboon Sillyman committed his sin of cutting 15 to 12...forever *******izing the sport of boxing.
Yes Braxton wins Yes it does hurt Lewis No Tyson's legacy doesnt improve Yes still gotta take Chavez. Sanchez wasnt with us long enough. Talent was there but.... Yes 12 rounds ruined ####
1.True... Within reason. 2. False. He defeated everyman he faced and he faced the most dangerous collection of punches of any heavyweight. 3.True 4. Absolutely True. Hail Julio! 5. False. It is still on the rise. Tho maybe you are too blind to see it.