Truthfully How Cam Anyman In The Sport Of Boxing Be Called A Ducker Or Scared?

So what? The whole point is DLH still took a fight like that that is even LESS of interest then DLH vs. Margarito. And since you think DLH vs., Margarito wouldn't sell, and that being a reason it shouldn't happen, I just provided an example. Whether it was a tune up or not is irrelevant to the topic.

He always got $$$$$. Today is no different then 10 years ago. Howver, this is getting mixed up in what was claimed. DLH said he;d fight the winner of Cotto vs. Margarito right? Before he said he'd neve fight another guy from Puerto Rico, but was obviously banking on Cotto, since he THEN said no fights vs. a Mexican. And we all kjnow he was looking at Mora (a Mexican..) for his fight. And we can add DLH saying maybe he should fight Williams instead since he beat Margarito. We both know he would never fight Williams. It doesn't take 20-20 vision to see DLH wanted no part of margarito at all. He uses fighters to keep his name relevant. And quite obviously ducked Margarito, since he did say THE WINNER of their fight would be next.

 

They both sell. But Cotto sells more in New York. Think they would fight in NY? What has more of a selling point, DLH vs. Forbes or DLH vs. Margarito?

 

atsch I doubt you even really believe this.

 

No, I am using the logic you dictated.

DLH should fight Cotto because it sells more then Margarito. That's what you said.

Well, DLH shouldve fought Margarito because its a better fight then vs. Forbes and would sell more.

Follow? Consistency is a mutha****a isn't it.

 

You mean DLH fought Forbes. And again, if it's about selling, which is the deal you made, being a tune up or not is irrelevant.

And please, fighting Forbes did nothing to prepare DLH for Floyd. C'mon. You didn't buy that ****.

Either way, DLH's actions and his excuse after excuse showed how badly he ducked Margarito.

 

They don't,it's business.You take the risk/reward factor and size it in,most times it ain't good,some takeit,some don't.But they are fighters and should take all fights offered.

 

I agree but in comparison to fighters 40-50 years ago, about 80% of todays champions are pussies, which merely means that they in many cases avoid the toughest challenges and don't really care to prove that they are the best...Think of a group of fireman that go around only putting out trash can fires instead of dealing with whatever emergency arises.

Fighters that are a throwback to long ago:

Paul Williams
Israel Vazquez
Rafael Marquez
Joel Casamayor
Jose luis Castillo
Kelly Pavlik

There are a few others, these are just examples

 

if you're afraid then you're afraid, if you duck someone, you duck someone.......you can sugarcoat it with fancy words like "high risk, low reward" or "not enough money involved" but i dont like too

just because you're a boxer, or even a great one doesn't mean you're not still a man.....and any man is acceptable to fear

 

This is true also.

 

If you don't fight your mandatory challenger, you're a ducker; you let boxing and your fans down. If you're choosing to fight a lesser fighter instead of one who should be on your radar, you're avoiding him, but that doesn't mean you're letting boxing down or your fans down necessarily. You might be planning to fight him later on, for much more money. There's nothing wrong with that. This is how the business of boxing works.