Try to score Froch vs. Dirrell, round-for-round

Its called boxing. I know a lot of Brits don't understand this, but the purpose of boxing is not to get hit.

If he want to stop movement, you are best learning how to cut off the ring.

 

Watch Dirrell fight sorry but i rather watch paint dry or grass grow.

I will only watch that clown again when he gets knocked the **** out.

 

i know you are american and americans wont understand this...but you have to take the title from the champion....you wont do this running, grabbing and faking injury

 

No you don't have to "take the title" you simply have to win the most rounds or knock the other fighter out. That is the same regardless of the fighter being the champ or not.

I should have expected this from the typical brit boxing follower.

 

Dirrell won the fight.

 

A true compubox would have been grand

 

What the **** does 'argumentate' mean? It's not even a word. As for that fight; it's tiresome hearing people say Dirrell won based on the fact he won a couple of late rounds more clearly than any others, and spent most the fight on the floor, running away or holding on for dear life. If anything he should've been disqualified for all that. Best I could argue would be a draw, 'cause Froch wasn't particularly effective either, although you could argue that he was effective enough to make Dirrell **** his pants every time he was within three feet of him.

Dirrell learned from his negativity and upped his game against Abraham, but the guy has a glass chin and he knows it.

 

Dirrell won, but both guys deserved to lose. Dirrell for fighting like a ***** and Froch for being so crude and ineffective.

 

I agree that Dirrell was the real winner on the night.

How many of us no-marks can say we had the honour of sharing a ring with an Iron Chinned Warrior who is the two time WBC Super middleweight and the reigning IBF Super middleweight Champion?

What a 'win' for the special little guy :deal

 

Dirrell deserved the verdict but it doesn't change the fact that 'Bama knows **** all about boxing.

 

1.Froch
2. Dirrell
3. Froch
4. Dirrell
5. Dirrell
6. Froch
7. Even
8. Dirrell
9. Dirrell
10. Dirrell
11. Dirrell
12. Dirrell

 

cant remember my exact card but i had Froch by 2 or 3

Dirrel threw away the fight by not fighting in the middle of the fight, running and clinching

and when Dirrel clinched Froch threw, maybe not effective but he was the one actually fighting and i rewarded him for that

i will say the rounds Dirrel won were more convincing than the ones Froch won

but 7 or 8 tough rounds still beats 4 solid rounds

i mean if the judging system was more rewarding of close rounds then who knows but in a round by round the difference doesnt matter

i think some times we get carried away by one guy looking phenomenal for only a fraction of the fight but not the entire fight

Dirrel proved he could stand his ground and hurt Froch when he chose to, the problem was he chose not to for the majority of the bout

 

exactly looking great in a few rounds doesnt mean you won the fight