Tunney vs Holyfield

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by BUDW, Jun 8, 2009.


  1. spittle8

    spittle8 Dropping Fisticuffs Full Member

    1,046
    4
    Dec 13, 2008
    Seems reasonable. In all fairness Holyfield would be significantly larger than anyone Tunney had faced or Tunney himself. He's also fast, has very respectable power and has skills. Coming up in the same era I'd favor Tunney as a talent but h2h I have trouble seeing him deal comfortably with such a skilled big man. Holyfield wasn't really a small heavyweight IMO.
     
  2. joe the great

    joe the great Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,453
    2
    Jul 24, 2004
    Tunney only lost one bout drew three times. You make a good point on the low weights though. It is tough to call. Tunney only losing one fight out of 84 with 3 draws. HGolyfield does have the weight advantage though.
     
  3. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    100
    Aug 21, 2008
    No he didn't, he fought him a no-decision, which reports generally consider to have been close.
     
  4. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,054
    2,529
    Jul 11, 2005
    Holyfield outworks Tunney in a rough fight.
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Holyfield would batter him.
     
  6. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    I think they earlier, faster, harder working but a bit more vulnerable and less powerful Holyfield matches up better with Tunney than the one who beat Tyson. The latter i'd consider to be 50/50.