Tyrell Biggs v Gary Mason

Once a challenger makes it to the money fights he often stays in the money fights. A former challenger is quite saleable as a stepping stone for other contenders. he can look to Gatecrash the title scene by winning another big fight or return to the prospect circuit. Sometimes the decision is not just the fighter. Often he has investors who have sponsored him this far without making a profit. They might want to pull the plug on supporting another campaign through the ranks. Maybe the fighter himself needs to support a lifestyle he can no longer afford? The trail into the money fights is a life's work, it can be a brave choice to turn down big chances having already got that far.

I think Jimmy Braddock said it best, it was something like "when you are evenly matched you are in there to win. if your ability matches the other guy and its a little better than his you win. If it dosnt it's to his advantage. "sometimes you get the breaks, sometimes you don't. If you get the breaks your there, your up on top, if you don't your on the bottom".

I don't no the circumstances surrounding why exactly Biggs chose such fights but maybe they only look like bad decisions in hindsight? Not all fighters have the luxery of being able to to choose a sensible route back to the title after failing in a first titleshot.

 

Sometimes it's just luck. In the Amateurs Tyrell had it. In the pros it ran out. Once you get over a level where everyone on a good day can beat anyone it's down to who was lucky enough to be at their best, lucky enough not to get injured, lucky enough to react the right way at the right time, lucky enough to not be rusty, lucky enough to have an excuse., etc, etc.

It is easier to just say it was down to not having his mind right, not being strong enough. or being drawn into the wrong kind of fight. It kind of is the short answer anyway so it is not entirely incorect.

I heard that there was a rush to get Tyrell to the title before he went off the rails, that was the excuse used as to why after only 15 fights or so he was kind of fast tracked. Maybe that is a good explanation, I don't know because sometimes a whole lot of growing up and maturing is put on hold that it is a justifiable excuse. He did have a long amateur career.

I think matchmaking has a lot to do with it. Like I say maybe there was justification for the way TYrell was matched because he had pedigree. However for all his talent a fighter needs to have absolutely mastered one level before moving onto the next. Biggs did seem to get himself into wars but he also seemed to get a lot of "live" fights. The balance has to be right whereby the prospect learns without putting miles on the Clock.

 

I saw it at the RAH Biggs had pretty much fallen apart after Tyson crushed him. Against Mason he showed a few flashes of hand-speed and quick movement but as I remember Mason just walked through him. Here is a link to the fight,if it isnt as I described forgive me, it was a while ago .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dib2JMBGWm0


Biggs was on the gear by this time.

 

I think the info came from the Duva camp.I liked Biggs he had skills and heart, but not enough power.

 

Laughed out loud, in real life.

 

Yes I would say so. To groom a fighter of potential to reach his full potential the match Making has to be perfect.

He has to master 6 rounds before 10 rounds and in doing so must learn from fighters good enough to offer resistance without creating life and death wars.

The advantage needs to be 80-20 for confidence then 70-30 to learn something. The real art is finding a match that looks 50-50 on paper but the ambitions of the opponent actually provide 70-30 because he is disadvantaged in size, age or preparation. His pedigree offer seasoning with less risk. Records can be misleading. Often managers sign the worst guy with the best record but this won't pan out since the record is often so bogus the opponent cannot offer anything. It dosnt pay to match a prospect against too many punchers.

I remember Biggs getting David Bey, renaldo snipes and Jeff simms and all three were trying hard to beat biggs. Knock him out in fact. Around the same time the best learning fights Tyson could get were Tillis, Mitch green and Jose Ribalta who offered less hellfire and punching power. They were not quite the dangermen that Biggs was getting.

I can remember Bey looking half hearted against joe bugner in Australia but going berserk against Biggs. Same with SNipes. He was a rough handfull too and wild man Simms was on a big win streak too. Some how the people behind the champions always seem to know what guy is going to turn up on the night. Maybe it's bad luck? All I know is these guys tried to kill Biggs and just went through the motions when booked elsewhere.

 

Yes matched fairly tough and unlucky most opponents "woke up" for him.