Tyson and Ali showing the difference between punching power and punching ability

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ChrisPontius, Sep 10, 2008.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Sorry, no video. :yep

    But here is an interesting observation. Let's investigate the statistics of how Tyson and Ali performed during their absolute primes:


    Mike Tyson: 37-0-0 (34 KO).

    A total KO percentage of 92% with only James Tillis, Tony Tucker, James Smith and Mitch Green going the distance.

    Muhammad Ali: 28-0-0 (22).

    A 79% total KO percentage with Hunsaker (6 rounds), Johnson (10 r), Sabedong (10 r), Jones (10 r), Chuvalo (15 r), Terrel (15 r) lasting the distance.

    Tyson has the edge here.


    Now, let's examine how they did against contenders,fringe contenders and champions:

    Mike Tyson:

    James Tillis - Decision 10 rounds
    Mitch Green - Decision 10 rounds
    Trevor Berbick - TKO2
    James Smith - Decision 12 rounds
    Pinklon Thomas - TKO6
    Tony Tucker - Decision 12 rounds
    Tyrell Biggs - TKO7
    Larry Holmes - TKO4
    Tony Tubbs - TKO2
    Michael Spinks - KO1
    Frank Bruno - TKO5
    Carl Williams - TKO1

    A record of 12-0-0 (8KO), meaning a 67% knockout percentage.

    This content is protected



    Now, looking at Ali's better opponents:
    Muhammad Ali:

    Alex Miteff - TKO6 - Miteff was ranked in the ring top10 when they fought
    Billy Daniels - TKO7 - Dito
    Alejandro Lavorante - KO5 (Lavorante 2:1 favorite)
    Archie Moore - TKO4
    Doug Jones - Decision 10 rounds
    Henry Cooper - TKO5
    Sonny Liston - TKO6
    Sonny Liston II - KO1 (dubious, but no Ali's fault he didn't the distance)
    Floyd Patterson - TKO12
    George Chuvalo - Decision 15 rounds
    Henry Cooper II - TKO6
    Brain London - KO3
    Karl Mildenberger - TKO12
    Cleveland Williams - TKO3
    Zora Foley - TKO7
    Ernie Terrel - Decision 15 rounds


    A record of 16-0-0 (13 KO), amounting to a knockout percentage of 81%!



    So, here is the astonishing thing.

    Looking at how they performed against top opposition - Ali is actually the more dangerous hitter than Tyson, as witnessed by a KO percentage of 81% against Mike's 67!

    It is also clear that Tyson is great at putting away inferior opponents, which is shown by his significantly higher knockout ratio when including tomato cans, journeymen, etc.

    This content is protected



    Ali's high stoppage percentage against better opponents in the 60's is not a statistical anomaly: throughout his entire career, he stopped many durable opponents. In the 70's, he stopped Quarry twice, Foreman, Frazier, Lyle and Bonavena. Foreman has only been stopped once in a 15+ year career, Bonavena was never stopped again, Quarry was very durable, and Frazier was only stopped by Foreman. After '75, he seemed to deteriorate so far that he lost his ability to stop opponents and had to rely on other factors to win.


    The other interesting thing is that despite all of this, he did not have big one-punch power at all. In 40+ rounds, he never once managed to floor Ken Norton, who was stopped by basically every puncher he faced. Patterson, also not known for his strong chin, was only knocked down once in two fights, although he was stopped. Tyson would obliterate these boxers in a few rounds, but whether he can stop the before mentioned fighters is not a certainty at all.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,819
    47,706
    Mar 21, 2007
    Very nice observations, as always.

    It works in styles and degrees in my opinion. In short, Tyson's style is built for KO's, an he is aruably the example of a "maxed out" fighter in terms of skillset, for this style.

    The same thing is true for Ali, but he is a stylist, a slickster. A "maxed out" (this term is just meant to mean "the best example of his type in the division). Ali, the slickster, has multiple ways to stop opponents. He can stop fighters on accumalation, he can stop them by using their stamina issues against them, Ali was also very good at cutting oposition fighters, as we know.

    With Tyson he is looking for the flat concussive KO. If he unable to obtain it he doesn't have the mentality, or the generalship to turn a fighter's weakness against him, or box for accumilation.

    In short, Ali's style and tools give him more options as regards ways to stop a fighter than the KO artist. I think this is what we mean when we say sluggers are limited, ironically.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,819
    47,706
    Mar 21, 2007
    Patterson's punch resistance is underated.
     
  4. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,044
    Oct 25, 2006
    Interesting read, but some points to ponder:

    *Styles and reputation:

    Most of Ali's opponents chased after him, whereas Tyson often had to open up a defensive-minded fighter. Tyson's reputation as a puncher almost guaranteed him a hard night's work opening up a 'turtle.'

    With Ali's opponents mostly coming forward, it was easier for him to score with punches. His opponents weren't as defensive as were Tyson's.

    *Mentality

    Tyson struggled sometimes and became frustrated when things didn't quite go his way. Ali didn't seem affected by a stubborn foe. This surely would affect their capabilities in the ring.

    *Opponents

    The opponents you listed for Ali there for me aren't on the same level as the ones listed for Tyson.

    For instance, I can't see Tyson having much problem stopping or knocking out the vast majority of fighters listed for Ali, but a few listed for Tyson would most likely take Ali the full route.
    Can you include Ali's 70's opponents as a separate statistic for comparison?
    Just for interest's sake if for nothing else...say up to '76 when he was still pretty good.

    You should also remove the second Liston fight as it was undoubtedly rigged.

    Nonetheless, a good thought-provoking thread. Nice work.
     
  5. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,044
    Oct 25, 2006
    Good points.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,819
    47,706
    Mar 21, 2007
    Fair point.
     
  7. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Good posts, i dont like stats most of the time. But on the point Ali's power, underrated imo.
     
  8. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,044
    Oct 25, 2006
    I agree. I've always thought he was a better puncher than he's made out to be sometimes. His ungodly timing was also a big factor.
     
  9. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,044
    Oct 25, 2006
    Matt, I call your points 'good' but mine are only 'fair'?

    I'm not impressed.
     
  10. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    IMHO looking at those "better opponents" lists Tysons list contains a little less "dead wood" than Alis so as soon as you use percentages to score it Tyson loses out.

    Levarante being 2:1 favourite surprises me as well....
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,819
    47,706
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol:

    Fair to middling, I should say.
     
  12. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,044
    Oct 25, 2006
  13. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,079
    12,994
    Jan 4, 2008
    I wouldn't say Tyson's opponents were better than Ali's, but they were bigger and had stronger chins in general. On the other side their stamina was inferior, so I can see Ali stopping many of them in the late rounds, especially over 15.

    To be honest, though, I don't see many of Ali's opponents going the distance against a prime Tyson. Terrell would perhaps be a good bet.

    One should remember that he had trouble with his hands during the 70's, which made him pull his punches at times. His KO ratio was lower after the exile.

    That's a convenient cliché isn't it? "Undoubtly", even though there isn't any evidence to support, but some evidence to the contrary.

    I any case, you could well argue that Ali could (and should) have KO'd Terrell.
     
  15. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,559
    Dec 18, 2004
    I don't think Ali has particularly good power. If you hit someone often enough they'll go down. There's too many reports of his lack of power to suggest he was a good hitter. Cooper, Patterson were derisory of his ability to whack.


    6.5/10 for me. A decent rating.