Tyson banned from England

We both know what you said, but i understand a coward like you will not openly say you support 9/11 on a forum full of americans

Go back to ur hole with the rest of the extremists

 

its terrible what them terrorists did but its not just America that it happens to even though sometimes you seem to think it is, but it is partly Americas fault what did you think would happen when you got involved in a war that was nothing to do with you, America has made the war on terror much bigger than it was before you got involved that is the main reason why a lot of countries do not like America because you think your something special when in actual fact you make wars a hell of a lot worse than they already are.

 

very good. now why dont you post this 'supposed terrorist pm of mine' with its corresponding pm number here as an official quote, and we will get a moderator to check if its real or not?

like this -

 

well his thread has taken a strange diversion

 

This is just silly

 

Stupid law - even Mandela would have been banned from visiting - there needs to be a case by case analysis.

 

http://topconservativenews.com/2012/06/does-maoa-gene-make-black-people-more-violent/

 

This is just stupid.

Even if he was guilty Tyson is not trying to move in. This **** happened over 20 years ago. The Tyson of today is a mellow dude and so high profile i doubt he goes anywhere in England without fans and media following him.

Let the man make a buck.

 

Because Tyson is a ******* had u seen those videos by tyson choosing pac over floyd. U.K. loves *****s. For the mean time watch floyd vs. King Khan next April.

 

****** or not its a stupid law- by putting. Blanket ban and not reviewing case by case it does not serve the public interest - I think Tyson should be allowed to visit but whatever - I'd be more interested in meeting people like aung san suu kyi who also fall under the ban.

 

Dude, this is current science, no facts. The only thing the study says is that certain ethnicities have an increased likelihood of holding a certain gene mutation. There is thusfar no factual causality between the MAOA gene mutation and aggression. As far as I know there only is a correlation. A mere correlation doesn't say much.
Your website also states that asians hardly have that gene mutation, but still there is a considerable amount of domestic violence in china. How would you explain this?

 

All Mike has to do is board the plane and when it lands in England claim Asylum.
He'll then be housed,fed,and watered and be able to pursue his interests totally unhindered.

 

just to clarify. Apart from a correlation saying nothing, which you rightly pointed out.

We've recently covered the MAOA gene mutation in our studies at med school, and there is no reference to leading to a difference in race. If you read the link to the STUDY in Jugg's link, you will see as you have gathered that there is no link between the gene mutation and race in the actual study referred to. In fact quite the opposite, the study evidences that there is no significance in the difference between high and low activity groups in white and blacks. It is Juggs article that is deliberately misleading, I have no idea if Jugg is aware he/she has been mislead.

Interestingly, we were warned that the study was being misinterpreted by white extremists in parts of the world in order to prove their own racist agendas. So if anyone starts posting such information you should steer clear of such a goon. The gene is correlated with all sorts of behaviour, like superior risk assessment and smarter decision making, but obviously the racists pick and choose the correlations to suit their agenda.