Tyson banned from England

Eastern Euros have been at the grip of communism for the latter part of the 20th century. This is not their fault. The can't be blamed for Bolshevism
holding them in bondage their whole lives.

There are less academics in the spectrum of the far-right because most educational institutions have been usurped by Jews, and their Marxist lackeys.
They are at the forefront of brainwashing, and indoctrinating young and impressionable college kids.

And by the Turks are not white.

 

Mike Tyson makes no sense, the gun thing is just common sense. Check how many violent murders are in America vs UK, Germany, Japan. WHats the difference?

 

Tyson was treated as a hero in Ukraine and Russia. Tyson will go to France. What was it that Jerry Lee Lewis said about UK when they kicked him out?

 

Just about sums the UK up. They usually let every Tom Dick and Harry in, including Tyson at his worst many years ago, but now he is trying to be a better person they ban him. :?

 

No it is your country that is creating terrorists, people defending their own country call themselves freedom fighters, you call them terrorists for not accepting suppression. You get into their country, command them how to live, all to their own safety, and if they do not obey you call them terrorist with all consequences. Imagine THAT the other way around now.
You have a too low IQ to even think about the false flag theories of 9/11, that's why you are there serving in Afganistan, a brainwashed soldier is a good soldier.

 

whats genetic related violence? seriously please do define it. how is it diffierent to non genetic related violence? specifically tell me - is it when the person committing the violence is black? so when a white mum beats a child, its non genetic violence, but when a black mum hits her child its genetic violence.... yeah try explaining that. funny guy.


genetic related violence, lol. the world has only just mapped out the human gene, but you seem to be ahead of the world in your knowledge of genetic material.
I cant imagine why you haven't put a patent on your knowledge if its true, you'd be a billionaire by now.
oh, its not true.... that's why.

BECASUE YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT A CORRELATION. this is not evidence at all to everyone in the world, but YOU think its evidence. So why are you the special case?

 

There you go. The suspects in this case are white and you automatically assume it has something to do with their socioeconomic factors.
Why do you flately exclude this option for non-white people and rather stick to dubious theories made by biased websites?

So? No one has to take a recruitment test in regard to his political orientation before entering a university. So how do jews keep right-wing minded people from obtaining higher education?

 

You have a general misperception of genetics and are not familiar with science in general. You can't read the genome of a person like a book and predict thereupon his future. Genetics doesn't work like that. One important sentence everyone, that is somehow involved in the field of genetics, learns is: "Genetics load the gun and the environment pulls the trigger". If you don't understand this don't even try to interpret a statistical analysis like the one you quoted.

Another crucial point is the fact that most character traits are genetically very complex and don't solely depend on the presence/lack of one single gene.
Blacks in the US for example have an increased incidence of depression. According to your logic it should be the exact opposite since the MAOA gene leads to a higher amount of serotonin in the brain which should prevent the presence of depression. How do you explain this according to your understanding of genetics?

 

I never said everything was set in stone by genetics. I said there was a higher probability of violence occurring among blacks, than it is whites.
Does environment play a crucial role? Of course it does, but the end of the day, low IQ's, high testosterone, lack of impulse control, and that MAOA gene
increase the probability of violent idiosyncrasies. That much is true.

 

The socioeconomic status' of Eastern European whites is the biggest reason they are more prone to crime than their Western counterparts. They lived a destitute life, and suffer to this day because of it. But I can tell you right off the bat that the Eastern Euros do much better than the Africans, or Arabs. That is pretty transparent, even to the most politically correct. Most Eastern Euros born in Western nations cannot be differentiated from the indigenous peoples. That is because they are white and have had a fresh start. Can't say the same for the blacks though. They receive much more financial support than any other group and still fail to make anything useful out of their lives. Why is that? Low IQ? I'm inclined to believe so.

As for the university topic; I merely said that the higher learning facilities have been tampered with and subverted by Jews. In doing this they can effectively use these institutions as indoctrination centers, rather than keep an objective learning environment which schools were originally meant for.

New kid goes to college. Professor indoctrinates impressionable youth into Marxism. The newly recruited Marxist youth goes on to brainwash other people with his/her misguided political affiliation. And the cycle repeats until there are people who see through all of the insidious lies and deceit, and tries to break this cycle through their own form of propaganda.

 

Yeah, this forum has basically turned into the boxing section of Stormfront. Holy **** at that racism here.

 

one things for sure, its a sign of low IQ to draw conclusions from a correlation. Why would you want to show people on a public forum that you lack the ability to understand this?

Best you avoid this subject now, really DONT get drawn into replying about it, and re-edit your posts ASAP to stop people realising your low reasoning powers.

 

the country that raped and pillaged whole continents and tried to enslave and wipe out african and native americans will not let a guy accused of **** who still denies it to this day will not allow him to step foot on their soil? lmao. fcuk em. he's too good for them anyway.

 

to be fair, the people who wont let him in are not the same people responsible for the evils of the British empire - those imperialists are long dead. All that remains is to fully rewrite Brit history to expose their lies about it. I am not saying that the British government isn't evil currently though, it stinks.

Although I don't see why renumeration hasn't occurred yet, except for the fact that it would bankrupt Britain. Same in AMerica, they didn't bother to recompense imprisoned slaves on their release for millions that they were owed in unpaid labour not to mention compensation. When this dawned on me, it was one of the most depressingly horrible epiphanies I have ever thought of.

 

so are u suggesting the uk should only be for anglos?