Tyson/Douglas: Tyson got beat up by Berbick, Page and McCall in Sparring

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Caelum, Mar 21, 2012.


  1. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    Heh?

    Tyson had a dominant run from 1985-91 over the course of seven years that was derailed only by prison sentence. He was 41-1 (36) over that time span and took care of just as many if not more rated opponents than anybody not named Ali, Louis or Holmes. He cleaned out a division and consistently fought the top rated of his era -- What you think of them isn't really relevant as he's a Heavyweight. There's nowhere else to go and you only have what's in front of you. Tyson fulfilled that obligation, and in a more devastating fashion than most before or since.

    Easily an ATG.
     
  2. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,555
    Feb 28, 2012



    This is the truth^^^ I mentioned this in another thread, the sport needs phenoms ideally in the Heavy Weight division.

    The problem here is money and people protecting there "investment" the multitude or orgs and BS belts means that most of these pussies can sit on there paper title and milk it on home soil.

    It is about protecting your 0, even if that means fighting in the most boring way possible to achieve the result, this has become the objective, not taking on all corners for the pride of being the very best.
     
  3. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010
    This content is protected




    ___________
    Brooks always held out hope for Iron Mike

    Beyond the promise of a series of solid paydays for training Mike Tyson, Tommy Brooks always had a fleeting belief that if he just could reach Tyson, just get him to listen, get him to work, Tyson could still be the best heavyweight fighter in the world.

    After all the years, all the disgrace, Brooks was certain Tyson could still do it. Beyond the wild nights, the disgusting, criminal acts, Tommy Brooks believed he could turn the raw rage and punching power into that long-gone 20-year-old machine.

    "He's got more talent in his little finger than most all the rest of them," Brooks said. "Even now."

    This is the tease of Tyson. This is what keeps everyone coming back again and again.

    "(Tyson's) been cutting corners for so long, I'm not sure he knows another way now," Brooks said. "I'm regretful that a guy with so much talent and ability just went down the tubes. That's why I left Evander Holyfield. But if I had any indication that my watch with him would be like this, I would've stayed with Evander."

    Looking back, Brooks should've had every indication: There are no happy endings with this man. In the end, there's just disappointment, disillusionment and disgust. On the eve of Tyson playing his part as America's carnival act at a New York news conference Tuesday, there came a call to Brooks' New Jersey office. Tyson fired him. Actually, Tyson's people fired him.

    Brooks wasn't surprised. Tyson and the trainer hadn't talked for several months. The fighter is struggling to meet his payroll. After handling Tyson for the six fights since the end of his year-long suspension for flipping out on Holyfield, guess who was going? Do you think it was going to be Tyson's Yes-men enablers, or the trainer unafraid to tell the fighter the painful truth?

    "I'm disappointed that I didn't see the guy back to the title," Brooks said. "But I'm relieved that I don't have to deal with the idiots around him anymore. You've got guys backstabbing you, undermining what you're trying to accomplish in the gym. A majority of them didn't see the big picture. They were just living paycheck to paycheck from him."

    Which is what most of boxing does with Tyson, feed off him payday to payday. Everybody gets rich on his bad act. With Brooks, Tyson had little chance to beat Lewis. Without him, he has none. Even so, there's a good chance that Tyson never makes it to Vegas on April 6. It's ridiculous to think the melee in Manhattan could be the foundation for the Nevada Boxing Commission refusing to license Tyson.

    What, now Tyson's nuts? All of a sudden that proves it? Come on. If they were going to let him fight before Tuesday, they should let him fight now.

    "He's crazy like a fox," Brooks said. What people ought to be outraged about with Tyson isn't the staged lunacy of a news conference, but the revelation that charges could be brought against him for an alleged **** in Nevada. Again. This should inspire the rage of the moralists. The press conference? That's what people want out of Tyson, what they come to see, what they expect.

    For that alleged victim visiting Tyson's Las Vegas home months ago there are no tidy clips for the nightly news, no x-rated sound bites for the boom mikes. She's an alleged part of Tyson's act, part of his twisted persona, and that didn't seem so important to his Vegas licensing hearing until his WWF moment in New York.

    "Every time he's done something, he's come back," Brooks said. "He's like a bus wreck waiting to happen, but he always skirts (trouble). I told him many times, 'We live in a society. They've got rules and ethics, and if you don't conform, they've got a place for you.' They'll only put up with it so long. I hope to God that Mike doesn't get put in that place, because this time, he won't last there."

    Perhaps Tyson belongs back in prison. Once more, the criminal justice system will decide. Even without the looming charges, there's this question on the sheer merits of his fight record: Does he deserve a title shot, never mind this ridiculous two-fight series? More than that, does Tyson truly want the fight? "At times he does and at times, he doesn't," Brooks said. "If he could go fight Lewis and not train, he'd do it. He'd just show up and take his best shot on sheer ability. Mike only trained for two weeks, and he made it 11 rounds with Holyfield." This is the lure of Tyson. This is the tease. People still think there's one more great fight in him, one final flash of a long ago glory. But there isn't. He's done. Trouble is, it's hard to stop watching him. Tommy Brooks understands. It's hard resisting the possibilities, harder to truly believe they're gone now. All gone.

    Adrian Wojnarowski is a sports columnist for The Record (Northern N.J.) and a regular contributor to ESPN.com.


    http://espn.go.com/columns/wojnarowski_adrian/1317765.html
     
  4. tezel8764

    tezel8764 Boxing Junkie banned

    7,875
    12
    Mar 28, 2012
    You gotta give props to the 90's guys at least the B-Level dudes were all fighting each other.
     
  5. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010
    Tyson held the undisputed strap.

    Second title run? Post Prison run? HELL NO he was not in his prime. He was not good anymore. Notable people discussed this even before he went to prison.


    Rocky retired that's why. And he didn't reign long. So was Tyson's decision to not retire after Spinks like he said he was thinking about doing a bad choice?
    Maybe.

    Tyson couldn't have lost in his prime years?

    So are we saying, hypothetically speaking, if he still trained the same, and had Rooney with him, could he have lost when he got into the 90's against notable fighters like Evander and Lewis?
    YES. I think he "could" lose to them.

    And H2H "Fantasy" fights..again...YES...he "could" lose to certain fighters.
     
  6. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    To be honest, the 90s guys would get slaughtered in todays division. It's a completely different spectacle, like I've pointed out previously, you've got far more agile capable fighters coming in at 6'4-6'9 who know how to train their bodies to work despite their size.

    A guy like Tyson would end up being like (an inform and motivated) Tua was against the bigger fighters. They're just climbing too big of a bridge.

    For proof and evidence of that - why do you think so many people saw Margarito, Williams and co as the hardest fighters for Floyd to face at 147? Their skill set, or their sheer size and reach?
     
  7. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010
    Please name that list of today's top tier fighters excluding the Klitschko brothers. Also remember who Wlad lost to as well as Vitali.


    Williams would have troubled Floyd but Not Margarito.

    This content is protected


    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1139899/index.htm
     
  8. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Subjective opinion pieces from back in the day on a fighter who was always a mental nut case and prone to explosions even in his "prime" - what you're telling me is that Tyson had an extremely fragile mental state and consequently could not survive post D'Amato as anywhere near the fighter you think he was during D'Amato?

    Funny how other fighters come back from career setbacks, trainer changes, mentality changes, battles/wars, etcetera. Holyfield being a prime example who left the early 90s behind and the damage it did to his reputation to climb up in later fights.

    I don't think Williams or Margarito would have troubled Floyd, but I'm using it as a basis of how people are so stupid when judging how 3-4 inches of height would have an impact versus say Klitschko with 10 inches of height over Tyson.

    As for top tier fighters who would have done the business back in the 90s? Haye, Adamek, Arreola, Pulev, Helenius, Sam Peter (in his 2005-2006 form), Mariusz Wach, Odliner Solis.

    Tyson would be expected to beat every one of those fighters and I think in all cases with maybe the exception of Haye and maybe a fit version of Solis, he would - but other fighters from that early 90s era?

    You're kidding yourself if you think the late 80s and early 90s had better fighters than the 00s and the 10s.
     
  9. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010
    Did you read it? Did you see who was quoted in there and what they were saying about his decline?
    Just look at it from a technical stand-point. His skills eroded when he left Rooney. He stopped training in the style that made him Champion.

    Floyd Patterson was once asked "what advice would you give Mike Tyson" {after his loss to Douglas}...and he said, "remember what got you there."

    Tyson was young, lots of pressure, lots of fame, lots of money. A bit different case than some other fighters. But yes, a bit of a nutcase. Some other would have handled it...like ALI, Jack Johnson, and others.



    Wlad is 6'5. He said so himself. Vitali, not sure about. 6'7 I think. I didn't know 6'5 and 6'7 was 10 inches taller than 5'11.

    O', Tucker was 6'5 and had a long reach yet the little guy Tyson was landing hard jabs on him...as well as on 6'5 Green and 6'5 Ribalta. We're just talking height, right?
    I think Tucker was also 6'5.

    What training can do for a fighter. And when he doesn't, he gets beat up by 6'4 Douglas. Again, the reason for "proper" training.

    Yeah, Tyson was a bit of nutcase. Every fighter is different. Most aren't Holyfield. Actually, I'm not sure who fits in with Holyfield.

    And he did rebound. After Doulgas, he put up some solid wins..notably his two fights with Ruddock before heading to jail. And he did regain "A" title after Prison despite being ****.
     
  10. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010
    :lol:

    I know you're trolling.

    Kubrat Pulev I haven't seen much of. Hold my opinion on him.
     
  11. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Give me a list of eight names from the era you're speaking of without naming Tyson, McCall or Lewis who would dominate the current era fighters I stated.

    Then we'll see whos trolling.
     
  12. HeavyweightCP

    HeavyweightCP Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,424
    62
    Oct 16, 2011

    prime razor ruddock bowe and holyfield
     
  13. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Good list of eight there.

    Ruddock was TKOed several times by guys who barely weighed 200lbs. What's he going to be like taking bombs from 245lb fighters?

    Bowe would be competitive, no question.

    Holyfield could be competitive but in my view, too small of a fighter and while he was competitive against Lennox in their second fight, it was more a case of what Lewis was doing wrong rather than Holyfield doing right.
     
  14. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    Holyfield didn't have the stamina at that point in his career to fight for entire rounds. Lewis' size was definitely an issue, literally sucking the fight out of him. He described it as being covered by a cement blanket in the clinches.
     
  15. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Exactly my point. For his era, Lennox was a giant of a fighter at 6'5 - 240. In this era? He's about the average of guys in the Top 20.

    These days, your typical 215-220HW from the previous era simply aren't big enough to face the well conditioned HWs.

    Arreola and other fatties aside, but then they get detonated against the top crop.