Tyson/Douglas: Tyson got beat up by Berbick, Page and McCall in Sparring

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Caelum, Mar 21, 2012.


  1. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Bring Tommy "Gunn" Morrison into todays division and watch him get the **** knocked out of him. Bring Michael Moorer, that version of George Foreman, John Ruiz, Andrew Golota

    All guys who held titles in the 80s or 90s - all guys who would be absolutely sparked in todays division.
     
  2. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,570
    3,763
    May 4, 2012
    Was George Foreman or Ruiz a top class heavyweight for long? I think Bowe, Holy, Lewis, Tyson, Moorer, Ibeabuchi, Tua, etc. would have creamed the current contenders quicker and more violently than the Klit Bros have.
     
  3. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Lewis and Bowe from your list are the only two I see having any level of similar success in todays era as they had from the era before.

    Tua? Too short, too slow, too easy to beat.
    Ibeabuchi? Who knows, headcase fighter, not right upstairs, probably wouldn't have lasted
    Moorer? LOL.

    Tyson? Headcase, too short, struggled with skillful big men (which is what we have here)

    "More violently" than the Klit bros? You know the Klit bros have amongst the highest KO ratios of any champion ever, right?
     
  4. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,570
    3,763
    May 4, 2012
    Holyfield, Ibeabuchi, Lennox, Tyson, Bowe, Golota even would cream the top contenders.

    What contenders would give the guys I listed trouble?
     
  5. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,021
    3,851
    Nov 13, 2010
    Tua is far more proven than anyone in the top 10 today not named Klitschko. And what tall fighters did Tyson struggle against?
     
  6. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Far more proven, having never held a belt in an era of weak belt holders, having been dominated by Lewis and easily out pointed in his prime against Byrd?

    Yes, he gave us the fantastic Ibeabuchi fight and highlight reel KOs of Moorer and Ruiz, but anyone assuming he's a great fighter is sorely mistaken. He's a walking chin who couldn't work on the inside of skilled taller fighters.
     
  7. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,021
    3,851
    Nov 13, 2010
    Moorer, Mercer, Ruddock, Old Holmes, Old Foreman, Bruno, Morrison, Akinwande are a few more guys that would probably become titleists in the division today and even dominate. I'd go so far as to say Bruce Seldon even holds his own in the division today.
     
  8. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Dreamers.

    Basically, you're talking **** and it shows from the fact that you're naming people who couldn't even dominate their own eras against taller fighters, let alone this era against every fighter who would brutally outweigh and out height them
     
  9. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,021
    3,851
    Nov 13, 2010
    Weak beltholders like who, John Ruiz? If I recall Tua had one title shot against Lewis and another against Byrd. He wasn't a Don King fighter or he might have gotten a trinket like Ruiz did.

    Were interim championships are prevalent as today? I don't think so.
     
  10. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,021
    3,851
    Nov 13, 2010
    Height and weight doesn't mean ****.
     
  11. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,570
    3,763
    May 4, 2012
    :good

    So because Fury and Price are tall they'd win :rofl
     
  12. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,021
    3,851
    Nov 13, 2010
    Exactly. They haven't proven anything yet.
     
  13. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Its okay to dismiss Wlad getting ko'd by journeyman Purrity, but not Tyson who was clearly not prime anymore get stopped by Douglas? Vitali was struggling vs Byrd injury or no injury. I like the Klits, but give me a ****ing break! Mercer, Ruddock, Golota, an old Holmes, Ike, Rahman, Sanders, Tua, 90's Foreman, Briggs, and Moorer in their primes all pee in todays contenders butts. Adamek, Haye, Arreola, Chisora, Fury, they all get destroyed. Lewis and Sanders were already semi retired when Wlad and Vitali faced them! I'm sorry I had to say that, but its the truth! And this was Klits in their prime, unlike Tyson whose prime was short and in the 80's it was never in the 90's.
     
  14. eagleskins

    eagleskins Active Member Full Member

    1,478
    0
    Oct 5, 2010
    Lol. Tyson not prime at 24. Tyson sucked. Never beat one real fighter
     
  15. Caelum

    Caelum Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,404
    51
    May 16, 2010
    Yes, Vitali in his PRIME.

    You have to be Very Good to beat Vitali. Bigger guys with SKILLS, like I said, SKILLS, and size is key....will trouble Vtiali. Lewis showed a guy like him makes Vitali's magical defense disappear. And even his Great Stamina, when pressed past the comfort zone (and the same can be said about Lewis), big guys like that, wear out. But we are also talk about Lewis, a Super HW "ATG" fighter. Talented fighters aren't supposed to have easy time with each other. And I counting on all these guys being at their best since.

    If a smaller guy faces Vitali, you need to be slick and/or fast. Fast to slip the jab and get in on the inside and bang away at that Huge torso of his. And a big torso like that, on such a big man, can take affect on his stamina...especially shots placed under/on the heart, rib-cage, and liver area. "Vital" areas.

    Wlad's my favorite HW. People rip on his "Boring" style but to me, its brilliant for him. We've seen Wlad the enforcer and although more exciting, and dangerous, he was also more vulnerable. Wlad's more intelligent approach, cautious approach, chess-like approach, is much more beneficial to someone of his Size (who if pressed hard will burn out like we've seen in the past), his not so great chin, and his vulnerability to panic a bit when pressed hard (although it may have dimmed in more recent years but its hard to say because of competition).

    And the great part of boxing, even though we can rip on this guy and that, on that level, and it can simply come down to strength and power, sometimes, anybody can be defeated. We even saw this with Wlad.


    NBA Players: I'm strictly talking athletic ability. The size these guys are, their athletic ability is off the charts. You don't see athletes like them in boxing. Wlad, yes, but I wouldn't put him as an exceptional athlete for his size/weight like Lebron James and others.


    First: Just because you are a good amateur does not mean you will be a good Pro. We've seen this plenty of times throughout history. Who knows what Savon would have done as a pro. He had the chance to fight Mike Tyson and turned it down. He was knocked out a number of times as an amateur.

    Stevenson was another one. Great amateur but who knows what he would have done as a pro. I like both but I just don't know. He too was offered to fight Ali and turned it down. But did that have to do with more of not being a seasoned pro and more comfortable as an amateur? Yeah, maybe. But who knows.

    But overall, I like the skill set of both of them.

    Quick note: There was an aritlce, maybe a few, and I think they may have actually been put on this site on the front-page, with former Soviet fighters talking about their era and if they could have turned pro. It was an interesting read. I think one guy talked about how he didn't think it was possible until he saw Kostya Tszyu years later make the transition and then thought, maybe it is possible. But also noted that 3 round fighting is less that then 12-15. And it does make a difference. The longer the fight goes, the more you can be exposed Mentally, Physically, and Technically.

    Even an out of condition Ali, when he went to the Soviet Union, the Soviet fighters were impressed with Ali. I didn't get it because I saw what Ali looked like then and he wasn't impressive anymore. but hey, seeing Ali in person brings that aura of Greatness with him.

    Some of those fighters were also in better condition than we see with some of the guys today. I mean, what is up with Povetkin?

    Emanuel Steward said the Klitschkos are the last of the true Soviet fighters. I mean, just look at them physically and technically and look at the others that are in the HW division. Now some of the lower weight guys are still quite good. But again, Amateur and Pro are different and we don't know which ones fail and which ones succeed. My favorite was Kostya Tszyu. Great Amateur, Good pro...well conditioned. Although I'm not sure he lived up to the expectations I thought he should have done but maybe he was what he was.

    The problem I have with many of today's fighters is similar to what I had problems with in the 80's...lack of mental toughness and condition. Technical skills we can get to later.

    Let's take what many Trainers and Former Fighters point to: the current Amateur system which prefers to use head-gear and a point system that allows for pitt-patty punches. It forces the amateur to adjust for the Pro game and not all do and when you combine that with the others, it makes for a different style of fight. A "Sport" more than a "Fight" like we saw the grinders back in the day.
    Now that doesn't mean we don't see quality amateurs who don't care for the pitty-pat style as well as pros that go for the kill...but overall, it may be true. And they should go back to the original way of the amateur system that many Great notable HOF Boxers have gone through.