Tyson ducked: Foreman, Lewis

you are absolutely stupid. i wanted to say that he never won a rematch after he lost against these bums

 

I think you need to do your research especially since I just proved you wrong. BTW Ruddock was a good win.

 

:rofl:rofl you are definitely idiot. i knew that tyson did beat ruddock twice before you was born. i know on boxing Considerably more than you, i wanted to say that he lost against pure **** as douglas, mcbride, williams and he never won a rematch.and foreman in his 40s knocked moorer out (top fighter),he did beat cooney, cooper,briggs(foreman won clearly) and he was competent in his 40s against prime holyfield, prime morrison... old foreman 90-91 would absolutely kill danny williams,kevin mcbride or buster douglas. holyfield destroyed douglas early and old foreman fought a war against evander lmao:rofl:rofl

 

Foreman never won a rematch in his life. And Tyson did better than Foreman against mutual opponents
Vs Steve Zouski. Tyson Ko him in 3. Foreman Ko him in 4
Vs MArk Young. Tyson Ko him in 1 round. Foreman in 7
Vs Alex Stewart. Tyson KO him in 1 round, Foreman MD 10
Vs Lou Savarese. Tyson KO him in 1 round. Foreman SD 12

Tyson = Most intimidating Heavyweight in history. Not Foreman

 

I'm probably younger than you but I act more mature. Hopefully you're younger because I can't believe someone older than 19 would act this immature. Williams & McBride fought a shot Tyson but I see Lewis & Holyfield(96) beating old George. And no, I fail to believe you know more boxing than me I breathe it. I'm done but if you care to debate like a grown ass man then go ahead but I will not respond to your childish nonsense. Oh and do your history it'll help you.

 

YOU ARE COMPARING PRIME TYSON WITH OLD FOREMAN, AND STILL OLD FOREMAN DID BEAT MIKE JAMESON IN 4 ROUNDS AND PRIME TYSON IN 5.
YOUR ARGUMENT IS SIMPLY PATHETIC..IT DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE NOTHING BECAUSE STYLES MAKE FIGHTS, MIKE WAS FASTER AND HE COULD CATCH BOXERS WHO MIGHT RUN FROM GEORGE. AND FOREMAN DID BEAT JOE FRAZIER TWICE.... SO HE WON A REMATCH
AND ALI WANTED NO PART OF THE REMATCH WITH FOREMAN.
TYSON INTIMIDATED TOMATO CANS AS BERBICK, TOMMAS, MCNELEY OR BRUNO.. HE COULD NOT INTIMIDATE REAL BOXERS AS HOLYFIELD OR LENNOX LEWIS, THEY BOTH OLDER THAN MIKE. IN THIS CASE THE INTIMIDATOR WAS FOREMAN AND TYSON WAS THE VICTIM BECAUSE GEORGE CALLED MIKE 150 TIMES AND MIKE RAN LIKE A CHICKEN.

GAME OVER BOY :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Good point. Tyson in his day scared the crap outta his opponents. The only guys I can think of that could've striked more fear than him are Dempsey & Liston.

 

obviously i can talk with you seriously because you have no argument to talk with me

 

if anybody defends tyson with any nonsense you would say "good point" hahaa poor poor noob

 

Don't bother champ, the guy you're talking to is not strong on being logical.

 

I can still remember Ken Norton looking very nervous as he was waiting for his fight with George Foreman to start. Foreman was as intimidating as the three mentioned in your quote.

 

Kenny was nervous against any puncher like Shavers, Cooney, so it was not just Foreman. GF was intimidating too don't get me wrong.

 

poor old ken was crapping it
norton was the epitome of body beautiful but george was a stone heavier and it looked more.at the time i couldn't see anybody beating george and i was one of many who felt sorry for ali.

 

OBVIOUSLY FOREMAN WANTED THE TITLE, WHEN TYSON LOST THE TITLE AGAINST DOUGLAS, EVANDER DESTROYED BUSTER, THEN FOREMAN WANTED FACED THE CHAMP, OBVIOUSLY BECAUSE TYSON WAS NOT NOBODY!!!!.
BUT GEORGE FOREMAN DID RETURN TO DEFEAT THE CHAMP MIKE TYSON.you have your article, i have the mine. in my article says tyson "YOU fight this ****ing animal if you love him so much"

SO TYSON WANTED NO PART OF GEORGE FOREMAN, and george did return when mike was still in his best moment undefeated in 1987. obviously foreman was sure on his style against tyson