TYSON FURY: EDDIE HEARN IS A MUPPET

If that was the case then I would call it a "win win", Brook wanted the fight for a long time and Hearn needed a fighter to face Golovkin.

Brook was paid extremely well, Hearn filled the PPV date, I don't see a problem with it from Brooks or Hearn's point of view.

It wasn't Hearn forcing him and it wasn't Brook being manipulated, Brook said he wanted a Golovkin fight, the opportunity came up and he got one.

Have a look at the pictures of Brook and Golovkin on the scales, standing next to each other, it wasn't an outrageous size difference and Brook didn't look fat or bloated, Brook looked rather good at 160.

Also, Let's remember Brook was stopped on his feet, never dropped, it wasn't a one or two round massacre.

Also let's remember Brook got exactly the same injury from another welterweight in his very next fight so the injury against Golovkin wasn't just because it was at 160.

Was the decision to fight Spence Jr Hearn's choice? Was that injury Hearn's fault? No, it was Brooks decision and the injury was just one of those things.


As for the duty of care stuff, if your own father and the trainer/friend you've known since you were a child give it the OK then Hearn is way down the list of people who should take any blame.

 

What is a managers job?

 

Hearn is a crazy man allowing his fighter to move up 2 weights. surely something like this has never been seen in the sport before. Surely this will lead to a ban for Hearn, isnt that right Stephanie rising?

 

A manager's job is to look after his fighter's interests, get the biggest purse possible. Of course, the manager is looking after his own interests, because he's on a percentage of the fighter's purse.

 

Brook got exactly the same injury against another welterweight in his very next fight.. Was that also Hearn's fault?

Let's forget about his father, trainer and friend giving the Golovkin fight the OK, let's just blame Hearn?

It's getting really pathetic, bias and agenda driven and when you are called on it you want to ignore blatant facts.

And nobody is obsessed with money.. YOU are obsessed with Hearn and slaughtering him for promoting a fighter and making him millions, Hearn is doing his job as a promoter and a very good job too.

I just pointed out to you that your boy Wilder still hasn't earned 5 million for a single fight and yet you still want to call Hearn a terrible promoter.

It's been said many times how badly promoted Wilder has been throughout his career yet I don't see you slaughtering Team Wilder or Shirley Winkle.. why not?

We wouldn't be talking money if you Wilder Fanboys were not talking Hearn, why? Because Hearn is a promoter and that is his job.. numbers/money

How else are we suppose to judge Hearn? As a promoter you are judged by what you do for the fighters you work with.

Or should we judge Hearn on how skilled his fighters are? How many fights they win? How many titles they win? How they are 10 years down the line?

So I suggest you go and work out what a promoters job is then judge Hearn on that and also judge every other promoter on the same basis and then call out Hearn.

But don't just pick and choose, try to twist things just to suit a point that isn't a good one to start with.

 

I think you and others are missing the point of what we are trying to say.

What annoys us is this blind following of Matchroom fc who literally believe EVERYTHING Hearn says as gospel and just repeat the script fed to them through Sky and Hearn.

 

Nobody believes everything Hearn says, Hearn is a slippery ****, but let's not pretend Hearn is some sort of monster and bad for boxing, he does a great job for his fighters.

I asked these questions the other day and nobody answered..

How many fighters have sued Hearn?

How many fighters have said Hearn didn't pay them or didn't pay them on time?

How many fighters how have worked with Hearn have said he screwed them over?


Now ask those questions about the other promoters.

 

Boxing fans should judge a promoter by the quality and value-for-money of the shows they promote.
That's all.

 

Eddie Hearn is overtaking ESB as a number #1 topic! Surpassing Wilder
I love it.

 

OK, let's do that, what promoter regularly puts on better shows/events than Hearn?

 

Hahaha

But, but, but, but Wilder Vs Fury is the biggest fight in boxing, it's a MEGA FIGHT.

I'm so confused Mr L

 

Not saying you personally but many do and plenty are on this forum.

Nobody is saying he is a monster, again you are literally missing the point.

My main problem with Hearn is the stubhub link, basically ripping off fans and how everything decent HAS to be PPV.

The bull**** amuses me as it does with all promoters past and present.

Will repeat what I said, the main problem people have is this weird cult likefollowing that is blind to anything anybody says outside of Matchroom and sky sports news.

 

We are always going to have the odd few that will just defend somebody because they won't back down, sometimes for the sake of it or sometimes just for the argument, we get them on nearly every subject and from many different sides.

They annoy the F out of me too, there is no talking to them, no debate and it is pathetic.

Yes, Stubhub, there should be laws against that, I want to see prosecutions, it's disgusting.

PPV, well for years it's been coming, I was on abused on here so many times because apparently I was tight and it was "only the price of a round of drinks". I can't just blame Hearn. Sky, ITV and other promoters have and will abuse that.

I'm fine with supporters of fighters and I do like to see loyalty but I want to see consistency, if you blame Hearn for something then at least judge rival promoters by the same standards and just be honest.