Tyson Fury has failed 3 drug tests which is more than Povetkin and Ortiz but gets no abuse.

elevated levels or an adverse analytical finding is not a positive test but it still means you have a review in order to determine if there is a case to answer. Nothing surrounding this case quite adds up if there was no leak to the press (from within UKAD) then this case would have never made the light of day.

 

Nope. You said earlier that the B sample was clear. Was it?

This wasn’t a review, this was an anti doping case for failed tests for a powerful steroid amongst other infringements.

 

Yeah, the whole medical exemption stuff is scary. It’s basically OK to cheat as long as you have a note from the Doctor. That needs to stop.

 

I can only go by what has been reported in the press, I don't have access to the samples or the necessary testing equipment. Regardless both samples were negative.

 

Your miles off the pace here pal, do a bit of research and we can have a proper discussion about it.

 

Ok, so you don’t have access to any samples or evidence but confidently state that both samples were negative? So, they had a protracted anti-doping case and accepted two year doping bans and admit to the presence of exogenous steroids even though the samples were negative?

You’re either trolling, ill or related.

 

Please post this magical evidence.

 

Adverse anlytical findings.

 

Nobody admitted the samples were negative, they even presented the excuse of contaminated offal.

 

Ffs. The wild boar excuse was because the findings were...........Positive.

So now they are making unbelievable excuses for negative findings. **** off.

 

Neither test were positive under UKAD rules. They showed elevated levels (an adverse analytical finding).

 

No, that’s not true. The source of the Nandrolone was exogenous. To explain...it couldn’t possibly be described as occurring naturally in the body of either fighter. If they were indeed genetic freaks that naturally produced Nandrolone then the other clear tests as that you hide behind wouldn’t have happened. In effect your smokescreen if the other clear tests is the smoking gun that disproves your fake endogenous adverse analytical findings excuse.

Deal with it, they failed tests for powerful steroids and are both inveterate cheats. Anyway, let’s pause this and see if Pulev can knock the naturally occurring and not at all suspicious spots off Hughie.

 

The explanation the Fury's gave to UKAD was either a contaminated supplement or wild boar offal. Of course the press picked up on the latter. UKAD themselves told the Fury's this was likely from a contaminated supplement.

 

Hearsay and bull****.

Fact is they failed tests for powerful steroids and were eventually banned for it after an incompetent process by UKAD.

Oh, by the way, what about those B samples?

 

They test showed elevated levels and UKAD decided, in retrospect after the case was leaked to the press, that they have a case to answer. If you remember there were not even any charges bought against them yet UKAD had still to go to a hearing to decide what charges were appropriate.