Tyson Fury In 1900?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jul 25, 2016.


  1. Sullivan2.0

    Sullivan2.0 Member Full Member

    162
    4
    Jan 25, 2013
    No I'm not. I'm saying its not a good jab and it isn't.
     
  2. Sullivan2.0

    Sullivan2.0 Member Full Member

    162
    4
    Jan 25, 2013

    Again beating a 39 year old Klit is not impressive. I haven't even said there going to out jab him. Just Fury's jab isn't good. They don't need to jab at all to beat him.
     
  3. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,651
    18,481
    Jun 25, 2014
    I agree.
     
  4. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,651
    18,481
    Jun 25, 2014
    Who are "they?"

    Who are you picking to beat him from 1900?
     
  5. Setanta

    Setanta Guest

    Sports science has proved that a 60 year old man who trains properly can be as fit as a 20 year old man so Wlad at 39 is not old according to sports scientist he has been training practically his whole life and was the fittest 39 year old I ever saw

    Fury has a very good jab and great footwork both of these aspects of his game were better then Wlad's were

    Your post is nonsense old John L Sullivan is looking down upon Fury smiling

    He looks down upon you with scorn
     
  6. bcr

    bcr Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,563
    1,440
    Dec 21, 2013
    Don't underestimate the old heavies, a cruiserweight dropped Fury really bad.
     
  7. Setanta

    Setanta Guest

    I'm going to echo this as my answer to this thread
     
  8. Sullivan2.0

    Sullivan2.0 Member Full Member

    162
    4
    Jan 25, 2013
    How on earth can you watch KLit Fury and think Wlad looked fit and good. Sullivan laughs at Fury from on high.
     
  9. Setanta

    Setanta Guest

    No SULLIVAN is glad the lineal title is finally back in the hands of an irish man

    He is laughing at your lack of boxing knowledge

    Wlad came into the ring 100% fit and he lost to a superior boxer end of story
     
  10. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,651
    18,481
    Jun 25, 2014
    A 6'3" 210 pound former cruiserweight champion with an 82-inch (longer than Ali's) reach who was brutally hammered and stopped in seven by Fury.

    Again, what makes anyone think Tyson Fury is going 20 rounds with guys who Steve Cunningham would look like a giant standing next to?
     
  11. Sullivan2.0

    Sullivan2.0 Member Full Member

    162
    4
    Jan 25, 2013
    Wlad was 39 and overrated to begin with. No one with an ounce of boxing knowledge would give him credit for that. Oh yeah Fury is British Gypsy not Irish. Sullivan laughs at your lack of knowledge of ethnicity.
     
  12. Setanta

    Setanta Guest

    No point talking to this fool from now on

    It's quite clear your the one with no boxing knowledge son nobody in this thread is agreeing with your rubbish:deal
     
  13. Sullivan2.0

    Sullivan2.0 Member Full Member

    162
    4
    Jan 25, 2013
    If 100 people say a foolish thing it's still a foolish thing. Anyone who thinks Fury is good in anyway if spouting fiction. And most here are suffering from Nat Fleischer syndrome by seeing attributes from fighters that just aren't' there. :deal
     
  14. Setanta

    Setanta Guest

    Yea but your only 1 person son

    Everyone else is talking sense

    Stop embarrassing yourself
     
  15. Sullivan2.0

    Sullivan2.0 Member Full Member

    162
    4
    Jan 25, 2013
    When one finds himself on the side of the majority. It's time to pause and reflect and oh yeah, I thought you weren't talking to this old fool. :yep