Tyson fury in historic context

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Contro, Dec 2, 2018.


  1. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,700
    Jun 7, 2016
    1. Of all the fact that he showed up atmaybe 70-80% of what he used to be similar to Ali and Tyson in their comebacks but did that well(he won imo) shows how talented and underrated he was to begin with.




    2. Regardless of fury's legacy and his mistakes in the past, his boring style whatever.


    The courage and determination hes shown in the last year not just with the weigtloss but also in this fight makes him one of the great ones for me.
    He is an inspiration for anyone who is struggling in their life and feel hopeless.

    What a massive set of balls on this guy.

    Even if he never wins another fight in his life he has my respect.
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    So far, he's the best of the post-Klitschko era.
    He ended the Klitschko reign. I thought he schooled Klitschko, to be honest.

    I'm glad he's back.
    Hopefully he can live up to his promise.
     
    1ey, Ph33rknot, Big Ukrainian and 2 others like this.
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,573
    80,817
    Aug 21, 2012
    Unfortunately I suspect he's going to run head first into the only force that can truly beat him - a metric ton of christmas pudding, turkey, sausages, pies, ale and those little bits of pork crackling. Father Christmas has his number ;)
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    You're making me hungry now.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  5. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    1,037
    914
    Sep 11, 2017
    Unlike most here, I will rate current fighters. I have him at 32 ATG heavy. But realize he could later be number 22 or number 122.
    I like the danger!
     
  6. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    On my cards, he beat Wlad in Germany and Wilder in the US. Even without the three year layoff, that's impressive stuff. Moreso to do it on the cards since those are two all-time caliber punchers.
     
    ticar likes this.
  7. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    I will never understand the near impossibility, to say nothing of the FOOLISHINESS associated with these 'Greatest/Achievement' based lists... they are at best wholly inaccurate, but worst of all IMPOSSIBLE!

    DISCLAIMER - I understand 'trying' to list CHAMPIONS into an order of Who MIGHT the Better Champions be. I also LIKE Fury and Support him.

    BUT???

    How can anybody actually list fighters 'like' Fury (though he is Much, MUCH Improved and visibly too), But he/They are NOT GREAT fighters in the classic & typical understanding of Johnson, Jefferies, Dempsey, Tunney, LOUIS, WALCOTT, Charles, Marciano, ALI, Forman, Holmes, TYSON and too many more too numerous to list.

    1st problem 'slotting' these Achievement Based fighters into Position(s) soon afterward gets them Spoke about as though they Are Greats, which a) Their NOT and B) it is not only unfitting but INSULTING to real great H2H Fighters - Champion and Contenders alike.

    2cd problem is it begins to Write the WRONG & INNACURATE History, cheating so many far more superior and technically skilled First Rate Fighters.

    I like Fury and again he is visibly a far better boxer than he was a few years ago, BUT He IS NOT a great Boxer, Fighter, BoxFighter or whatever you wish him to be.

    I mean what about men like Holman Williams, Lloyd Marshall, Freddie Steele, Jock McAvoy, Len Harvey, or even guys like HW Jeremy Williams and the 'like' - who I think would have masterfully boxed rings around Fury and his ilk.

    I just don't get it... today you Slot him in, tomorrow he gets spoken like an ATG and hundreds of great fighters never get thought of again.

    It isn't just wrong, it is INACCURATE
     
    James Hudson likes this.
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Jeremy Williams?

    Seriously?
     
  9. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    My reaction too!
     
    Rock0052 likes this.
  10. nurological

    nurological Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,526
    10,705
    May 25, 2012
    Fury was robbed of greatness last night imo.
     
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,188
    23,792
    Jul 21, 2012
    He's the best of the post-Lewis era easily .

    Achieved one of the best comebacks off all time. His footwork/movement/stamina after losing 100lbs in just a year was amazing to witness.
    Fury is a 6'9 multi dimensional moving boxing phenomena and leagues greater than the duds that were around during the Klitschko era. This era is far greater and most would agree he's the #1
     
    ticar likes this.
  12. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,515
    36,066
    Jan 8, 2017
    If he'd have won last night he d have joined a very select few that regained the actual lineal title. And beaten the odds to .Historically he'd have done rather well .Time will tell if he can reach the very top again.
     
  13. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,568
    17,648
    Apr 3, 2012
    Fury never lost the lineal title and Wilder never was lineal.
     
  14. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    You use words like WRONG and INACCURATE... as if we're debating factual things here. Which, of course, we're not!

    You're naturally entitled to believe everything today is ****, but that doesn't necessarily mean you're right. It's just your opinion!

    Besides, claiming that Jeremy Williams would have "boxed rings around Fury and his ilk", doesn't exactly enhance your credibility in these kinds of discussions!
     
  15. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    DON'T make the Context mistake here.

    Williams is NOT a S-HW, so yes the BIGGER Men will usually beat the Smaller Man, that's obvious and history records thousands of such efforts of Small Great Fighters losing to BIGGER Men not necessary better... but that's NOT what we're talking about, are we?

    the CONTEXT is ridiculously automatically throwing lesser world champions into Great/ACHIEVEMENT Based Lists, - and then Erroneously, all of a sudden, having them being discussed among the GREATS as though they are!

    that's the CONTEXT, and then many a forgotten or excluded BETTER or Greater fighter who doesn't get thrown into such lists is inaccurately no longer relevant but a Fury suddenly is.

    Jeremy Williams, the L-HW cum HW is a perfect example of a MUCH Better fighter & boxer to the Fury's whom get wrongly thrown in to such lists.

    yes this Jeremy Williams.

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...30A1F601EBC02376FA0030A1F601EBC0&&FORM=VRDGAR