Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by f1ght3rz, Apr 26, 2022.
it's NOT Enough to be a GREAT Fighter, never mind of All-time.
Nowhere close and never will be.
Wlad's age ended that reign
Prime Wlad is 2011/2012
Get out of here with that nonsense.
Not like fury went life and death with an even older version he dominated him.
Wlad is a bum dosser OG big stiff idiot & Fury destroys any version, age or sexuality of him.
Sigh,,, Wlad was 40,,,,and that fight is the worst title fight in decades, an ant hill outside my house has more action than that , The Lawrence Welk show was more exciting . It was like watching two zombies on the walking dead meandering around a locked room looking for a way out. The total landed punches could be counted on your fingers. The CIA forces prisoners to watch a tape of that fight as a torture technique to extract information, by the fifth round prisoners are screaming for them to stop it , watching it twice can induce coma and death.
I thought it was glorious. Totally out gamed. Fury defused him so badly that Wlad literally couldn't put up a fight if he wanted to! Had to resort to flying headbutts LMAO.
Chisora, Whyte and Wilder also felt what it's like to get totally worked out and picked apart.
You must know you are extraordinarily biased & almost everyone will think you are living up to your own self-deprecating description of idiocy-at least on the subject of Fury, who you over-identify to a massive degree.
I have problems with Wlad's clinching/rule violations, but what he & some others accompished & against who is significantly more-in quality & quantity-than Fury.
It is not even in the same ballpark.
You are providing no evidence that a prime Wlad would do not better than an old, gun-shy version.
Are there any *other* examples of fighters who lost around 40 who you assume would do not better in their prime, years before?
Especially if they were champion for...Forever?
Even more so if they were unable or unwilling to even fight their own style when older?
You just picked a horse for psychological reasons, & shall defend him regardless of what happens or the facts.
Put another way-similar to how scientists decide whether a theory is rational-is whether it is even potentially falsifiable.
Could Fury ever do anything that you would deem damaging to his rating, or caused you to adjust your opinions?
Tyson Fury is infallible.
The scary thing is that you never have given any indication of being ironic.
This is exactly what you believe.
Part of you must know better.
Fury could KO AJ and Usyk on the same night and people will still talk him down.
He is a direct descendant of Hercules himself. His story is far from over.
GOATs don't run away leaving unfinished business
he doesn`t even come close.
No, it ended when Tyson outboxed him in his backyard. Wlad was still in excellent shape, even when he gave AJ a tough scrap. Who else at the time could have beaten Wlad?
Some people are too hard on Fury. You are the opposite extreme.
At best there is no way at all to know if you are at all joking when you write things like he is descended from a fictional character, Hercules...Or that he is infallible.
Consider that this level of hero worship is not healthy.
Even if you are not delusional that he is perfect or unbeatable.
Am I the only one who remembers he used PEDs? Everyone here is quick with damning clenelo (tbw not a fan) but gives Fury a pass