Tyson Fury new video Fury DESTROYS Usyk

Elvizzz · Sep 8, 2022

Midwood said: ↑

he is a clown
Click to expand...

And you are a princess

ikrasevic · Sep 8, 2022

Let Fury destroy Usyk in the ring, not on YouTube.

Midwood · Sep 8, 2022

ikrasevic said: ↑

Let Fury destroy Usyk in the ring, not on YouTube.
Click to expand...

he couldn’t beat wallin

navigator · Sep 8, 2022

Fine-tuned, expanded for undeconstructable comprehensiveness and with linked sources, to the chagrin of the valiant white knights of Joshua;

navigator said: ↑

Here's the timeline of events beginning June 2018;

First came Hearn's "flat fee" offer, [url]which Wilder accepted around the halfway mark of June[/url].

[url]Hearn had indicated that Povetkin was next in line throughout the early part of that month, while ostensibly leaving room for the possibility of facing Wilder instead[/url] (the WBA were reportedly willing to defer the mandatory, should a deal be struck for Joshua-Wilder). The risible "flat fee" smacked of typically Hearnian lowball/PR moves rather than a genuine proposal, but, yet and still, the bluff was called. As such, [url]matters stalled in the next two weeks due to Hearn's messing around[/url] and no further progress was made, [url]ergo the WBA put their foot down with regard to Joshua's mandatory obligation to Povetkin[/url].

In light of the above, we can fairly assume it was never Hearn's intent for Joshua to meet Wilder on any date in 2018. This becomes even more clear when one considers that, immediately following the WBA's intervention, [url]he proposed a two-fight deal for Wilder to box on DAZN, with the second bout mooted to be an April 2019 encounter with Joshua[/url]. That isn't to say Hearn really wanted the fight for April 2019, either, [url]given that he was now insisting on a one-way rematch clause in favor of his client, which Wilder publically rejected for good reason[/url], [url]further stating that he was done making concessions and would only negotiate on an equal footing in future[/url].

A month later, [url]with Joshua-Povetkin having been finalized and announced in the intervening period[/url], Hearn [url]began insisting that Wilder should face Dillian Whyte on DAZN to facilitate or hype the supposed April 2019 bout with Joshua[/url]. It apparently didn't matter to Hearn that Wilder had made concessions in mid-June in an attempt to get the fight on with immediate effect and had subsequently stated that he was done conceding after having his time wasted and being insulted by an offer which included an entirely unreasonable one-way rematch clause. All that mattered to Hearn was [url]'cheeky bantz' and spinning the conceit that Wilder was the avoidant party all along.[/url]

As an aside, in August, [url]Hearn and Joshua were called out on their avoidance of Deontay Wilder by none other than Lennox Lewis[/url] and [url]Tyson Luke Fury[/url].

A day prior to Joshua-Povetkin, [url]Finkel responded to Hearn's spin on behalf of Wilder;[/url]

[url]"There was an email sent to him and his father Barry last Monday. It says very clearly what he needs to do to make a deal with us. So, for him to say this and say that, it's all bull****.[/url] [url]I've said to him clearly, instead of the stupidness he sent us earlier [referring to the one-way rematch clause in Joshua's favor], send us a real offer and we will respond. If your father wants to meet on October 6th or 7th in New York, I'd be glad to. But it's a waste of time if we don't have a real offer.[/url] [url]The truth is, they have sent me emails and I've responded each time. I even responded this week to their email on Friday. If needed, I will produce it.[/url] [url]If they really want to fight Deontay Wilder, respond to it with a real offer. Otherwise, don't keep saying you haven't heard anything, or we'll show it."[/url]

Days after Joshua-Povetkin, [url]Finkel reiterated;[/url]

[url]"I have sent three separate emails to Barry saying that I have no desire to meet unless I have a real offer for Wilder to meet Joshua. He and I have been in the business long enough to know what that offer would look like.[/url] [url]Team Joshua does not care what fight the public that supports them wants. If they did, they would follow the poll they created to determine who the public wants Joshua to fight next.[/url] [url]The public spoke and Joshua hid. Where is the new offer? Nowhere to be found."[/url]

[url]Tyson Luke Fury, meanwhile, stepped into the breach and did what Hearn and Joshua had lacked the nerve to do[/url], [url]creating one of the most indelible images in heavyweight history in the 12th round[/url].

[url]In early 2019, Wilder and his business handlers held talks with DAZN's John Skipper, discussions which Hearn was expressly excluded from[/url]. Ultimately, instead of committing to a reportedly lucrative multi-fight deal with a 2020 Joshua double mooted as the endgame, [url]Team Wilder decided to resume their established TV network relationships and their unfinished business with Tyson Luke Fury[/url] — this was not just entirely understandable, in light of the changes in the heavyweight landscape over the preceding nine months (specifically, Fury's resurrection and the considerable buzz their December 2018 bout had created), but also prescient, given that Joshua's status would be endangered by defeat to Andy Ruiz three months after the Skipper talks.

Within a year of those talks, with each man having fought twice in 2019, Wilder and Fury would rematch as planned, [url]Wilder being guaranteed in excess of $25,000,000 for the bout[/url] in addition to [url]the combined $40,000,000 he made in 2019 from Breazeale and Ortiz II[/url].

Now, if we go way back to April 2018, we can remind ourselves that Team Joshua had rebuffed [url]an offer of $50,000,000 base[/url], made soon after Joshua had blurted this;

This content is protected

[url]Joshua would later rationalize the rejection of that offer with vague talk of protecting "certain partnerships"[/url], presumably an allusion to the rumored notion that Wilder's business handlers were attempting to assign UK broadcast rights to BT Sport. Soon after, [url]Showtime's Stephen Espinoza would explicitly debunk that rumor, pulling up the relevant receipt and utterly humiliating Hearn, while Hearn hid behind the knowledge that Espinoza wouldn't be so unprofessional as to reproduce an entire contract on Twitter[/url].

Right on, Deontay. Right on.

Hearn's negotiational fudging wriggled Joshua out of that bout in April-June of 2018 when Wilder was ready and willing to fight, and there's no way around that. No amount of references to DAZN multi-fight offers can deconstruct it.

It was the slimeball's intention, of course. His modus operandi is all too transparent by now.

Whatever Wilder's character flaws are, he certainly had no issue with honorably agreeing to a two-way rematch clause for his return bout with Tyson Fury.
Click to expand...

thefightfan · Sep 8, 2022

Perfect talk from a man that knows he has a fight on his hands. Fury couldn't be anything more than brilliant in THAT VID. Timing is right at this time WAR FURY. BRING IT ON

941Jeremy · Sep 8, 2022

I didn't watch it but let me guess, he called him a middleweight, a bum, a dosser, and so on. Followed by no one can defeat the Gypsy King, I'll smash him to bits, I need half a billion dollars, blah blah blah. It's getting old. Fight or retire and stay retired my God he's annoying.

Log in or Sign up

Tyson Fury new video Fury DESTROYS Usyk

Elvizzz Boxing Addict Full Member

ikrasevic Who is ready to suffer for Christ (the truth)? Full Member

Midwood Member banned Full Member

navigator "Billy Graham? He's my man." banned Full Member

thefightfan Active Member Full Member

941Jeremy Active Member Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

Tyson Fury new video Fury DESTROYS Usyk

Elvizzz Boxing Addict Full Member

ikrasevic Who is ready to suffer for Christ (the truth)? Full Member

Midwood Member banned Full Member

navigator "Billy Graham? He's my man." banned Full Member

thefightfan Active Member Full Member

941Jeremy Active Member Full Member