Tyson Fury: Says beating Price gains him nothing

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Sir Will Wigan, Jul 9, 2012.


  1. Sir Will Wigan

    Sir Will Wigan HLF: A Real "Fightin' Man" Full Member

    3,936
    415
    Jan 16, 2011
  2. unorthodox

    unorthodox Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    0
    Mar 20, 2009
    crispy duck & pancakes anyone?
     
  3. zulander

    zulander Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,851
    1,518
    Mar 17, 2006
    he doesnt need to fight him now for sure, but its one that will have to happen somewhere down the line
     
  4. glue glove

    glue glove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    3
    Jun 9, 2010
    ...and his latest opponent gained him?
     
  5. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    I agree, Maddelone is a much better scalp
     
  6. split_decision

    split_decision Electronic information tampers with your soul Full Member

    5,456
    1,244
    Apr 14, 2010
    yeah ok Mr Fury you just keep having meaningfull fights against people like Rogan and Maddalone
    ****ing brain dead coward, just keep fighting bums until the Klitschko pay day comes along.

    if Fury and Price fought 100 times Price would win every time

    your quote says it all Chicken Fury
     
  7. liger05

    liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! Full Member

    4,101
    21
    Nov 11, 2008
    Fury is fighting bums yet claims a win over price gains him nothing. lol

    He doesnt want any part of david price!!
     
  8. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Fury doesnt need to fight Price now, however beating him would prove to be a major scalp, far better than anything he's done thus far.
     
  9. KingCobra

    KingCobra IBF World Champion Full Member

    5,933
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    Much as this is a fight that I'd like to see, I have to agree with with Fury. Boxing is Fury's living and if placed on the scales of risk vs reward, a fight with Price comes down firmly on the side of risk. If I were in Tyson's position, I'd be looking for a lucrative fight against a beatable prestigious opponent rather than a dangerous fight against a talented prospect.
     
  10. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
  11. unorthodox

    unorthodox Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    0
    Mar 20, 2009
    this to me highlights everything that is wrong with boxing in the modern era.

    no risk takers, no willingness to take the best & toughest fights out there & nothing good for the fans to look forward to.
     
  12. Duffy

    Duffy Guest

    They should dominate together when the Klits go rather than face each other for the good of Britain. I don't want to see one of our boys lose. :-((
     
  13. Sir Will Wigan

    Sir Will Wigan HLF: A Real "Fightin' Man" Full Member

    3,936
    415
    Jan 16, 2011
    Throw in Towers and make it a trio. :lol:
     
  14. KingCobra

    KingCobra IBF World Champion Full Member

    5,933
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    From a fan's perspective I couldn't agree more, that's why I admire Froch so much. If it were my career though, I'd have a different take on it. It's partly the fan's fault for placing such an emphasis on an unbeaten record that prevents the best from fighting each other. Fury is the product of such a system rather than the cause.
     
  15. glue glove

    glue glove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    3
    Jun 9, 2010
    Andy Murray HAS to face the best to win a title.

    Jessica Ennis HAS to face the best to win a title.

    Ronnie O'Sullivan HAS to face the best to win a title.

    I can go on and on, boxing is the only sport where you can avoid the best and be champ.

    Unless you're Martin Adams........

    Actually, would Price be the first guy Fury would face who is of equal size?