Styles make fights, and Wlad's age had to do with that too. Wlad struggled against a part time janitor the fight before that started boxing in his 20's. Yes, Fury would beat the Tyson Lennox beat, but he would get destroyed completely by a prime one. Not even a debate. It's funny that you think since an old Wlad couldnt cut the ring off on Fury that a prime Tyson who is FAR better at cutting the ring off and was used to fighting a bigger man unlike Wlad couldnt. You make yourself look foolish there.
The fact of the matter is back when Tyson was in his prime the guys wasent this big Tyson can't dominate in 2015 like he did in 1989 Psssh...excuses excuses Fury beat a 11 year undefeated champ and even Roy Jones played with him lol
LOL, is that a joke? 2015 is one of the weakest eras of boxing for the HW division. Dude stop using the Wlad fight to determine an outcome for this fight. Like I said, Wlad can't cut the ring off well, and his stamina definitely is questionable at his age now. That's like saying since Marquez knocked Pacquiao out, and beat him in the third fight he should have been able to beat Bradley. Tyson is a different style and animal than Wlad.
It's actually a great division right now it's only been boring because Wlad has dominated for 11 years !!!!! Fury at only 27 has changed that recently and it's more exciting then ever :deal Wilder Ortiz Povekin Fury Need more names ?
I'm a fan of Wilder, Ortiz, and Fury but what have they done? Povetkin has the best resume out of them all. Fury beat one ancient man that struggled against a janitor the fight before, and the rest of his resume is a complete and utter joke. The holmes that Tyson beat on would probably beat or give msot of those guys a good run . Ortiz might be the goods, I say put him in with Fury and let him finish the hypejob off, but I don't see that fight ever happening. You have to be jk saying it's more exciting than ever, did you miss the Fury/Wlad fight, one of the most boring fights of all time LOL. HW isn't any better than the MW division. Golovkin > Fury by far, and guys like BJS, Jacobs are at a higher level than the majority of the HW division. Hell even LW is better than HW with Croalla, Linares, Flanagan etc , you can definitely make a case for HW being the weakest division in boxing.
You start by saying you like fury but ended calling him a hype job :huh I find that funny after he just beat a guy 90 percent of experts said he wouldn't :thumbsup
I'm a fan of several boxers, but some great way overhyped. Don't worry I couldn't take you seriously after you used Fury beating an ancient Wlad on why Tyson wouldn't be able to hit him . That was probably one of the comparisons on this forum.
Name one fight at 140/147 you would you rather see over fury vs wilder for example be honest Psssh... Let me guess Ashley vs Broner in a rigged affair ? :huh
If you didn't take me serious you wouldn't waste so much energy responding to me :rofl I'm usually always right with my posts so if you don't bealive me I could care less but let's just sit back and watch Fury dominate some more ok:thumbsup
Brook/Khan Porter/Thurman I know Wilder is going to beat the stuffing out of him, while Brook has a great chance to KO khan, I think people are underestimating him. I think Khan with virgil can give him a good fight.
because I'm bored? Why not? Now ask yourself the same question, by your theory you take me seriously since you're responding. You just got owned by your own logic . if you were usually right with your posts, you would have more v cash than me, but you're clearly not.
Good fights But are they better quality fights honestly ?:huh Khan has been beat many times and Porter looked like a deer in front of headlights vs Brook on the other hand Wilder and Fury are in the top 5, undefeated and both have belts :deal