The battle of Britain. I think I would just have to go with the 'super' heavyweight Tyson Fury, he's just to big for Haye, who in fairness is just an over blown crusier. Haye who of course is an all time great I've been told, be that at CW just no way can get past Fury's massive jab, his reach is insane! Fury again with his extra 3 stone of weight is just to strong for the CW Haye. Haye's legs would buckle if he were to grapple with Fury. True Haye would have a slight chance to pot shot and run his way to a points victory ala his masterclass performance against the ATG Nik Valuev, but could that trick really work a second time? I think not, but who knows. In reality Fury against Haye would really be like a light heavy taking on a bantam weight. It's unsportsman like from Fury really, some would say it's cheating really. I suppose this mismatch yet again raises the legitimate question, 'Should there be a super heavyweight division?'
yeah, this manning doesn't seem too bright. haye would knock him out. fury is coming along nicely, but he's young and had only 14 fights. it's far too early to be talking like this.
If haye has s broken little pinky, Tyson all the way. . Or broken hand or . Damaged spine or . Lack of balls
Is this a serious question? I'm really not seeing what others are in Fury. David Price is our future at heavyweight.
Too early for Fury and has much to learn and improve on. I can see a brutal KO coming his way by a big left right from Haye.
Why make threads which are ridiculously easy to answer Haye would spank Fury That is a fact There is no doubt
One of those threads where im not 100% sure if its a wind up or not. If you seriously need to ask this question you probably shouldnt have an account here to be honest.