Tyson fury vs Deontay wilder who wins

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IRONSENSE2002, Aug 17, 2012.


  1. JeanPaulValley

    JeanPaulValley Boxing Addict banned

    4,738
    4
    May 31, 2012
    we dont know if Fury is more physically powerful. We do know that Wilder has KO'd many guys who are heavier than himself.
    It wont matter how fat Fury is when a Wilder right hand or left hook lands on that chin.
    But,Respect to both guys for fighting each other.
     
  2. boranbkk

    boranbkk "ไม่ได้โม้นะ" Full Member

    7,706
    776
    Feb 19, 2012
    Fury KOs Wilder and Price KOs em both on the same night.
     
  3. DaveyboyEssexUK

    DaveyboyEssexUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,441
    2
    Jan 14, 2011
    Fury to take this by Ko about rd 7, his jab will befuddle Wilder, hes got better movement too and can fight in both stances
     
  4. antonio8904

    antonio8904 Atheist Full Member

    6,138
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    this...^
     
  5. Big Ears

    Big Ears Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,274
    0
    Jun 5, 2005

    Some Canadian ?, Sam Langford was some Canadia, a fighter is not characterised by their nationality.

    That's not my logic. Fury is open to right hands, and he got caught with a big one against Pajkic, and I mentioned that Wilder stands a chance (albeit slim) if he can land that shot on Fury.

    But Owen Beck is a small Heavyweight, with a short reach and he had no problem getting close enough to use his jab, and he also had no problem finding the target. Owen Beck was a decent fighter in his prime, but the guy is a small Heavyweight, and he's now shot to ****, and on top of that he lost his last fight before Wilder to a pro debutante, but he still had what was required to land that jab with relative ease on Wilder.

    Fury is a large Heavyweight, with a large reach and unlike most people he would actually have an advantage on height and reach over Wilder, and he's got a very good jab, it's fast, accurate and quite hard (not Wladesque by any means but it's solid). I mean seriously what do you expect to happen, do you think all of a sudden Wilder is going to be slipping and parrying Fury's jab when he previously seemed to have little idea of what defense is ?

    Sure he could land that big right in the very first round and win the fight, but the chances of that happening are much less on his side than they are for Fury as he'll struggle to set the shot up. He's got potential to be a very good fighter, but he's just so, so raw, and Fury despite his failings is pretty decently schooled these days and I feel a fight between them would reflect that.
     
  6. JeanPaulValley

    JeanPaulValley Boxing Addict banned

    4,738
    4
    May 31, 2012
    You should have just started with that then instead of the pyramid of boxing as in "if A beats B,then B beats C who lost to A."

    Fury's best punch is his left hook to the body. His jab is decent now and less of a slap. Dont get me wrong,I like Fury for his guts alone. He's old school. But Fury's best win is still the battle with an out f shape Chisora who rocked him a few times. That fight wasnt a domination. Obviously Chisora has a great chin and a different style but how did Dereck rock Fury? It was fast pressure in the first few rounds. Wilder will do that. He will come out fast and strong and he will land. The last time Wilder was put down was 15 fights ago. Wilder is twice as talented now. His left hook,his right hand,the jab is better,the hand speed etc

    By no means is this an easy fight for Fury. Wilder is no Martin Rogan. Wilder isn't a cab driver looking for a check. The only guy Fury fought who would beat Wilder is Dereck.
    And Vinny Maddalone landed an overhand right in the first round against Fury. If Wilder lands that same punch,Fury will hit the deck.

    My money would be on Wilder in 1-2 rounds.
     
  7. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    :deal:deal

    it's an easy calculation to me.....

    glass chin + aggressiveness + power

    beats

    glass chin + not so aggressive + no power


    when glass chins are involved with both guys give it to the guy with power
     
  8. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,661
    Jul 8, 2010
    Fury = more proven.

    I'm going with him.
     
  9. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    yes but you are a dickhead.

    nobody cares about your racist, hate filled opinions.

    create a new Alt, this one has been exposed. repeatedly
     
  10. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    Royal-T-Bag
    Champion
    East Side Guru



    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Posts: 8,791


    alt :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl


    meanwhile you only been here a year, maybe you're an alt......


    Why do these brits always gotta take offense and call racism when someone doesn't like one their fighters? why can't they accept that some people just don't buy into the british hypejobs? there's some good british fighters that are actually world class to get behind, Fury and Price are a waste of your time, they're glass jaws waiting to be shattered. Ricky Burns is a really good technician that I like to watch will support against almost anyone at LW besides Broner, Groves is a good tough young kid with potential, Froch is an absolute beast with an IRON chin.....it's not like you don't have good options there, yall just get behind too many fighters and buy into the hype....reason why Khan was more popular than Froch. Just cause they're british doesn't mean you gotta love them and defend their honor til your death