I believe that unlike Wlad Fury would be able to outjab pulev and win a safe UD but like wlad he also has the option of just going around pulevs outstanding jab with bombs for the KO it would depend how he felt on the night either way Fury win
What makes you think Fury has a better jab than Pulev??? Show me a Fury fight where he dissected someone like Pulev did to Dimitrenko, and Ustinov. I don't think he would win a battle of the jabs against Pulev, no way.... Pulev is one of the best jabbers at HW, probably the best behind Wlad at the moment.
Wlad's jab has been fading for a while now pulev proved this. Fury dosn't utilise his jab as much as pulev as that makes you 1 dimensional and therefore predictable but Fury has the best jab in boxing right now due to speed, timing, technique and reach. Fury also shows more versatility in his jab then any other boxer deviating from a flicker jab, a jolt and backhands.
I have said for years Pulev is made to order for Fury. Fury would land at will and force a stoppage after turning his face to a pulp. Pulev is seriously overrated, much like Povetkin, although I think Povetkin Fury is a 50/50 fight.
Fury is a "star" because people watch him because he's a nutcase. He's a trainwreck waiting to happen.
worst thing that could happen to heavyweight boxing now is guy like fury becoming a champion. He's ugly, fat , clumsy , featherfisted oaf and even if wilder has a glass jaw and his boxing skills are limited he looks fit ,muscular and can punch , in other words he looks like a boxer who could represent boxing , unlike Fury , who is more of a clown that couldn't make it in circus. My girlfriend doesn't care about boxing but she knows pac, may, wlad and hopkins , when she saw fury box she said omg this guy is really ugly and that's how Fury looks to an average boxing fan.