If I were Dufus enough to believe that a big semi-mobile slab of meat like Tyson had the ability to achieve true pound for pound I'd agree with you 200%. Reality is, Tyson is just a short term title holder and the only real question is will he fail to meet or match Stiverne's number of defences? My guess is he will match but not exceed Stiverne. :yep
Quickest? Is that all you can say? In what world does quickness equate to P4P? 70% probability that Klitscho snatches his belt back from, The Furious One.
Fury will probably knock himself out with an uppercut, he is so uncoordinated. [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8VlkRxcIYA[/url]
I hope Fury wins, but let's see him beat Wlad twice before we start calling Fury among the best ever. Lots of guys can win one boring fight in which neither guy does much of anything. If Wlad decides beforehand that he can't outbox Fury for 12 and just goes for broke ... it's going to be really awkward around here if Klitschko comes out at the bell looking for a knockout and ends it quickly. Because I'm not sure Fury wins a firefight. We'll see. I just hope it's entertaining.
We'll probably get another boring decision. But, for some reason, I also see this fight as Wlad going for broke. Fury could knock him out. But I wouldn't be surprised if Wlad took out Fury, too. That Steve Cunningham knockdown is still right there in the back of my mind. Either way, I hope it's conclusive and dramatic. The last fight was fun because Fury won. But I wouldn't want to watch that first fight over again. Pretty dull, in hindsight.
Experience and age are two different things. Fury beat Wlad because he was big enough to, basically. Wlad was overrated and had no competition.
Hmm.... I wonder, do you know who Ray Robinson, Harry Greb, Henry Armstrong, Samuel Langford, Muhammad Ali, WIllie Pep or ROberto Duran are? When people say ridiculous things like what you're stating, it's just hard to take you seriously. YOu sound like someone who has no idea how rich the history of this sport is.