But is it really THAT much more impressive. He's beaten a once-great old fighter. A good, but not dominant Crusierweight Champ. A tough guy, twice who is now 29-8, and a few other good Journeymen.
Chisora and Hammer (not even including Wlad) are better than anyone Wilder has beaten aside from Ortiz.
Eh, what does this argument matter? Both are obviously among the three most significant players in the division. There's time for both men to add lustre to their respective records, and I expect they will end up duking it out for all the heavyweight marbles at some stage. Let's see where it all goes.
Duhaupas has been beaten anytime he stepped up, really. It's a good fight but I think Chisora is a more impressive win. Chisora is a clown but he's a damn good fighter and better than his record indicates. He has a ton of controversial losses. I think he beats anyone on Wilder's resume aside from Ortiz. Washington has done absolutely nothing at Heavyweight. His best win is a horribly boring decision over fat and undersized Chambers. He's decent, but I don't think it's fair to compare him against a prime Chisora or even Hammer. Arreola and Stiverne are guys who get blasted anytime they face top guys. Neither have an impressive performance or win. I know HW isn't deep, but these guys don't have any respectable wins.
