Now everybody's debating the infamous **** case? There were only 2 people in that room that night in Indiana 1991, everybody else can speculate for the next 40 -50 years what happened but the only ones that truly know are Tyson and the Woman, I don't even think DNA was around in 1991, so he was convicted on the facts the jury had to work with... One thing for Sure Tyson was guilty of BAD JUDGEMENT, and stupidity, and hiring some dumb washed up Lawyer, and you just can't go to a conservative white Republican state like Indiana and being black or Hispanic expect to get away with anything, not happening, it's bull**** but as long as the good ol boys are in charge nothings gonna change... Another thing I may add Tyson didn't learn anything from Indiana, he ended up right back in the slammer in 1998.:--( Stupid is as stupid does..
Actually Tyson never hired that guy, it was Don King who did that. The question is, why did King hire a tax attorney for a **** case, the guy had no expeience in the field. Makes you wonder, after all, Tyson was Kings meal ticket. Secondly, Tyson was getting sick of King not getting him a title shot. Think about this, just before Tyson was released King secured a $150m deal with Showtime. There's no way he would have got that kind of money in 91
It's pretty sick and twisted that you don't believe the scumbag ****d the poor girl, how low can a nuthugger go???
Why would it be "sick and twisted" to believe Tyson ? He's at least as believable as the girl who leveled similar unfounded charges on earlier occasions. And your characterization of Tyson indicates a pretty clear bias here.
Its funny why nobody ever mentions that the girl had accused her ex boyfriend of **** too, after consensual ***.
So basically, you know very little about the case? In that case, shut the **** up and let the grown folks talk.
Again shows how naive and dumb Tyson was here's a 25 year old man, who's gonna let some ex con rip off artist, who is a snake in King handle your affairs when your freedom is on the line by hiring some old scumbag tax attorney, well it's safe to assume Mr HR BLOCK blew the case Dumb dumb and dumber, that's like asking a plumber to fix your transmission. ain't gonna work:nono Hell King never gave a sh!t about anybody but himself, he really didn't need Tyson as a meal ticket, he was after Tommy Morrison back in the 90's because Morrison could draw similar numbers like Tyson because he was white, and had Julio cesar Chavez at the lower weight classes who drew huge numbers due to the Latino explosion of fight fans..
Sorry i disagree, there was no way Morrison would ever make anything like Tyson did. Wasn't Morrison managed by Bill Cayton, the same guy who made millions for Tyson.
Brilliant responses ! You're coming across as a stupic c unt who seems to know fukc all about the case, so like the othe dude told you, shut the fuc k up and p iss off back to your hole in the ground.
I seem to know more about the case than you two cretins!! Tyson was convicted of **** dumbass!! He was guilty!!
From your posts and your level of an alysis, it's doubtful if you know your ars e from a hole on the Yorkshire downs. More ****in' brilliance ! He was convicted in an American court so he MUST be guilty. You'd have to work yourself up a bit to reach 'cretin' level, lad.
I've never heard of the Yorkshire Downs you re****ed dimwit. Tyson was and is a known pervert and a child molester, the evidence strongly points to **** but only a sick, twisted nuthugger like yourself believes otherwise!