Tyson or Foreman: Who hit harder?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Oct 28, 2014.


  1. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,933
    Jun 13, 2012
    In your opinion, who was the harder puncher, Tyson or Foreman?
     
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Fist of all they both got the job done. Satisfactory results on both sides.

    Tyson was sharper. Clean and fast, with the ability to hit someone from their blind spot before they could brace themselves for impact. But Foreman had heavy hands and so much strength behind a punch. You get the impression even if you had time to brace yourself it would make the same result as Tyson hitting you blind.

    Interestingly at world level there are not too many one punch finishes for either fighter. Tyson has the Botha and WIlliams KO and Foreman has the Rodriguez and Moorer KO. At world level I think that's it.
     
  3. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,993
    12,318
    May 8, 2014
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,581
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would guess Foreman in terms of raw power, but it is impossible to be sure.
     
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,115
    25,281
    Jan 3, 2007
    If by chance I ever run into them both, I'll ask them to each punch the guy standing next to me, then ask the said person what he thinks.
     
  6. FastHands(beeb)

    FastHands(beeb) Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,496
    407
    Oct 28, 2010
    That is entirely dependent on whether the guy is still alive after taking the first clean shot from whomever goes first...
     
  7. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    Different kinds of power, tyson is more explosive, much faster and more technique. Foreman like power always intrigues me, not a lot of velocity, but so much mass is behind those punches that they smash and batter. I guess it's a special technique itself, so perhaps saying Tyson's punches use more technique is inaccurate.
     
  8. rex11y

    rex11y Active Member Full Member

    558
    12
    Oct 17, 2007
    Foreman was definitely the harder one shot puncher although Tyson had great explosive power putting all of his body into his punches relying more on positioning and combinations in his prime.
    The fact that George was still competitive with the upper echelons of the heavyweight division well into his forties is a testament to his raw power relying far less on technique than Tyson did.
     
  9. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,933
    Jun 13, 2012
    Holyfield said Foreman hits harder.
     
  10. Jester

    Jester Active Member Full Member

    885
    450
    Jul 27, 2014
    For one punch power, Foreman.
     
  11. Alexandrow Vids

    Alexandrow Vids Active Member Full Member

    505
    241
    Oct 28, 2014
  12. BoxingFanMike

    BoxingFanMike Member Full Member

    438
    389
    Jul 13, 2014
    Tyson's punching seems more like a cannon, Foreman's like a wrecking ball. Hard to tell who hit harder for a single punch, maybe George, think of Frazier being manhandled like that. Tyson was certainly capable of delivering better combinations and could therefore probably accumulate damage on an opponent faster.
     
  13. tommytheduke

    tommytheduke Active Member Full Member

    629
    164
    Nov 21, 2013
    1- Rocky Marciano
    2- George Foreman
    3- Max Baer
    4- Earnie Shavers
    5- Sonny Liston
    6- Joe Louis
    7- Jack Dempsey
    8- Cleveland Williams
    9- Bob Satterfield
    10- Mike Tyson
     
  14. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    both can reach the tipping point, Foreman was a clubber Mike sharper but both could hurt you with either hand