When we look back say 20 years from now, which Fury will be regarded as having been the better one? Why? Or will they even be remembered, save for a laugh over a pint at the pub?
Making an assessment on a 2-3 fight novice is impossible. We need to come back in 2 years time and then have this discussion, the view either way will be clearer by then.
I think Tyson will be a success He is 24 and has a good record is a huge character and is a much better boxer than given credit Hughie I can't tell you,you can have all the ability in the world it doesn't mean he will be a good pro though He has good speed footwork and jab/right cross though
Not for some, who have already proclaimed him as having the stuff of a future champion and breaking Mike Tyson's record for youngest champ. No one is going to get flogged if they're wrong. In a land of punters, one would think you'd find boxing fans willing to wager an opinion on which has the better future.
I think Hughie is a much better boxer than Tyson, though in time, both could pick up world titles. Tyson will have a lot on his plate with Haye, if he gets caught really clean early, it'll be lights out. If he holds him off for the 1st 6, Haye will gass and his KO power, will decline. If it goes past 6 rounds, my money's on Fury.
